posted 4 years ago
I’ve run into this a few times, but had a really obvious case yesterday.
There was a huge swarm of bees in the city centre of my home town, literally at head height on a street tree in the high street. The info was shared on Facebook, not as a “does anyone know a beekeeper”, but more along the lines of “isn’t this cool”. It was generally a really positive thread. I ended up collecting the bees myself.
However, there was one person who was slamming anyone who suggested that a beekeeper should collect them, and going down the line of the bees needing protecting, they are wild animals etc…
This individual was vehement that they should be left alone, but had no actual knowledge of bees, beekeeping, or what was the likely outcome of them being left alone (moving into someone’s building and then being killed). They genuinely believed that they had it right, and were totally unwilling to engaged in a discussion about alternatives.
Now my point wasn’t really to discuss this case, but it struck me that it is a stereotypical example of interactions I have had over the past few years over a range of issues - heartfelt beliefs, not supported by understanding of the nuances of the situation.
I’ve seen it recently in my community over recycling, pest control (rabbits and pigeons), burning of waste, use of cleaning products etc…
I presume others also have examples of this? Does anyone have a gentle way for steering such discussions into a constructive path?
1E8F1ED7-1D0B-4647-81CB-CD176F108D84.jpeg
Moderator, Treatment Free Beekeepers group on Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/treatmentfreebeekeepers/