Chris Lumpkin wrote:I have not added anything yet, but the hugelkultur entry pointed to this link (which redirects to the main permies www page), when I think it was intended to point to this one. I fixed that.
Did any of those old links get broken from a software upgrade, or forum reorg? We might want to check other places... or use Google to search them out. I will look at some more stuff there tomorrow.
paul wheaton wrote:It is best to use the new URLs whenever possible.
Chris Lumpkin wrote:It would be really awesome if we could tag stuff on permies, and then it would be super-duper easy to link in from the outside. Otherwise, I feel like that link is more of a liability, because another reorg can lose the thread (like what happened already), and lots of great content may be overlooked because we picked the thread that was not as active or meaningful as another. I think hierarchical organization of content like this is kind of limiting, anyways.
In the absence of tags, how should we decide which forum threads should be linked from Appropedia, or anywhere else? I feel like they should be somehow special, like a "sticky thread", or maybe in some cases an article is more appropriate. I guess we could all just use our best judgment... hope I'm not muddying the waters too much.
paul wheaton wrote:...
could be changed to this
that would be great. The number could be 1 to 5 digits long. The ".0" is ignored.
neil bertrando wrote:Do you guys have visions for criteria that can be set out for an appropedia article?
quantity of content
neil bertrando wrote:I would like to start participating in threads on the forums that are collaborative towards building wiki articles, databases, and other detailed, searchable, and even hopefully sortable tools for us all to use.
any thoughts on good approaches to this?