Hello!
This is my first post. I've been reading a bit on here, and I decided it was finally time to ask a question.
I'll be working on some
land that has an intermittent channel running through it. I've never actually seen the channel carry
water, but I'm pretty sure it was designed to do so. I was thinking I might be able to use hugulkultur beds as a way to slow and spread any water that does come through. I could use it as a full check dam, but I was thinking it might be better to make the water snake its way through the channel, directing it with the beds. Has anyone considered something like this? A leaky dam may also be a viable option.
Some details:
The channel comes from the mouth of a canyon coming off of a mountain. The channel further up the mountain likely doesn't exceed 5 feet in width. The bed of the channel on the property is about 20 feet wide. The banks then rise up 20-30 feet over another 20-30 feet of width. So this channel is way bigger than anything else around. I've never seen water flowing, though that may change after this winter when the snow melts. I'm in Provo, Utah. The length of channel on the property is about 1400 feet. About half the channel has a slope of 2-12° while the other half has a slope of 12-18°. The channel banks are eroding a bit, so I'm going to try and work stabilization into the design as well.
Here are my thoughts--hugulkultur beds can absorb a ton of water. Water is one of my biggest concerns for this property. This channel is fairly protected from wind and excessive sun, so it
should be easier to retain the water in that area, particularly if all the water that falls there gets sucked into hugulkulturs. I imagine the hugulkulturs will be a temporary feature (on the scale of years or decades) but it seems like it could work on the short term, and may even benefit the channel long term by decreasing erosion. I'd love to hear feedback on why this would or would not work