posted 12 years ago
Hi there,
it's perhaps not as bad as it sounds: but we're tinkering with the idea to convert a hectare or two (or three) into a landscape of alternative housing models (cob house, straw bale house, earth ship) and to create "edible landscapes". However, the ground is close of a creek, and is almost flat, with very low differences in height. I'd say that in botanical terms this would have been a potential flood area; more of a zone of willows and other trees which accept to get wet feet. The soil is heavy clay, and seems to be not very deep - 30 centimeters, al least on the small slopes further up. So, not sure about the depth.
The idea is to actually profit of these conditions and create a small lake and large natural swimming pool. This could be surrounded then by a few huts standing on poles. And then, a bit further away, other forms of houses as mentioned above. The former would be integrated into some form of "wetland vegetation", while the latter than should more be of something "normal" - hugelbeet etc.
I wonder however if with these soil and habitat conditions, we can successfully construct those alternative buildings and plant vegetables (this shouldn't be a problem as the roots are not deep), bushes and trees.
What do you think? Sure enough, these are not enough descriptors to reasonably judge the zone. But still, it would be great if someone with experience can share their view on this.
Thanks a lot for any hints!