http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12202.pdf
 
 THE CHICAGO PLAN REVISITED    (Aug 2012 report)
 
                  Abstract
 At the height of the Great Depression a number of leading U.S. economists advanced a 
 proposal for monetary reform that became known as the Chicago Plan. It envisaged the 
 separation of the monetary and credit functions of the banking system, by requiring 100% 
 reserve backing for deposits. Irving Fisher (1936) claimed the following advantages for this 
 plan: 
 (1) Much better control of a major source of business cycle fluctuations, sudden 
 increases and contractions of bank credit and of the supply of bank-created money.             
 (2) Complete elimination of bank runs. 
 (3) 
Dramatic reduction of the (net) public debt.       
 (4) Dramatic reduction of private debt, as money creation no longer requires simultaneous 
 debt creation. 
 
 We study these claims by embedding a comprehensive and carefully calibrated 
 model of the banking system in a DSGE model of the U.S. economy. We find support for all 
 four of Fisher's claims. Furthermore, output gains approach 10 percent, and steady state 
 inflation can drop to zero without posing problems for the conduct of monetary policy.