In what sense do you mean by voting? Like can I vote at elections, then yes.
The main thing that irks me with currencies is the inefficiency of how they are created and managed. I prefer hard metal currencies because, pragmatically speaking, they have the longest lifespan and thus the cost of production decreases the longer the hard currencies stay in circulation. Just like
John Green and
CGP Grey, I hate pennies!
Also, I have a slight problem with "In God We Trust" being on all American currency because in my opinion, I think it violates the Establishment Clause. I much prefer the original phrases used on early American currency such As "Mind Your Business" and "We Are One" which reflect two values that I like: 1) a sense of
moderated national unity 2) a sense of respect for other people's business. One of the best examples of this is the early
Fugio Cent. Also, the history surrounding "In God We Trust" rather irks me, too because it went into law because the USA was afraid of communism and wanted to say that we are a religious nation. I do not have a problem with people believing whatever they want, but I kinda have a problem when they try to get religion into the government. I do understand that what god, which one(s), and the definition of god were not explicitly stated which leaves the meaning ambiguous, but that seems to be aside from point. The church or any churches are not supposed to be related to the government in any form, even if it is ambiguous.
My ideal currency would be based on efficiency, ecology, and applied permaculture. I would like a currency that encourages good business practices. I think it would be rather hard to base a currency on such things; I think it would be more appropriate to base investment strategies on sound permaculture principles because the goal of permaculture is to make a permanent culture. Therefore, the best investments would in theory be on the most regenerative and beneficial practices. I couldn't find the video I was thinking of, but this gets pretty close:
I think the currency itself is of little consequence because currency is just a medium of exchange meant to make our lives easier. If you want real change, change the economy and change the people. Nonetheless, I do think the type of currency makes some difference:
EDIT: so on second thought, the form the currency does make some type of difference. For example, when the security measures of dollar bills are updated, old bills that are no longer in circulation either get burned or shredded. Then, the cycle repeats. At least, there is some recycling going on... Maybe a biological currency could be used... hmm...like having a little companion with you that tracks expenses and incomes and can never lie, keeping a perfect record.... maybe its health could be tied to environmental, social, and other influences... if the environment degrades, its memory degrades, causing financial losses to users in a locale and financial gains to those in locales making progress or maintaining the current situation; then when new goals are set, the health requirements of the companions could be raised forcing everyone to meet the minimum standards someway or face financial loss. This could possibly fit under the Power of Taxation Clause, but the technology for such a companion does not yet exist, and the ethics of it might cause a stir.