Mike, no worries about me taking offence - I know it isn't the cleanest approach. Quick question in response though - do you ever have bonfires on site? If so you are already making that same pollution in the burn process, but without any of the mitigating benefits of producing biochar alongside it.
We probably have a bonfire half a dozen times per year on our 8 acres. Large diameter stuff goes for the
wood stove, small diameter stuff goes for
compost or gets put through the small chipper we have. Anything in the middle ground is likely to get burned, along with various
perennial weeds (
bindweed in particular) with cannot be disposed of reliably by composting. We try to make this as clean a burn as possible - material is left to dry for a reasonable period, the fire is constructed carefully and managed to flame rather than smoke. We burn a lot of material on one site, rather than have many small fires.
As a decent sized bonfire burns the embers fall and build up in a nice layer, under ashes. The ashes protect the embers from oxygen so only the gases burn. Once the flames have died down and all the woody material has broken down to embers it is straight forward to douse the whole fire with lots of water, turning those embers into lots of biochar.
We make lots of biochar, with a lot less labour input than previouslyOur periodic bonfires now contribute in a positive way to our soil by providing biocharCareful management has reduced the number of fires we have, and the air pollution due to an open burn.
I did this this week and, from a single bonfire, produced around 10 times as much biochar as I would have done from my old barrel methods. I would guestimate that I saved around 20 hours labour compared to preparing each batch of materials for the burn, monitoring 10 separate burns, quenching the resulting char etc...
Ultimately it is a trade off between quick and effective, vrs slow and clean... I suspect that low yields in small batches will result in your system being under used.