posted 11 years ago
Oaks are deciduous. They were the primary tree in their forests. That is bing more specific for his area. Yours was probably white oak or osage, but probably had more diversity than his due to climate.
Savanna has more edge, it has more open space than a true forest. It is a good approximation for what the transition from forest to plains was like. It also has much more space for "crops." It is not 100% true to the history for that area, but is close enough to be self-supporting and tuned to be more productive to the farmer's needs. Change the species to ones with more profitable yields but still fill the same role in the biome. Adjust the spacing and density to fit some mechanization. Not 100% correct to history, not 100% bent to the will of modern agriculture--but a synergistic balance between the two.
"You must be the change you want to see in the world." "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." --Mahatma Gandhi
"Preach the Gospel always, and if necessary, use words." --Francis of Assisi.
"Family farms work when the whole family works the farm." -- Adam Klaus