posted 11 years ago
My partner and I are hoping to purchase our first home within the next year and came across a great rent-to-own property which will be available to purchase next summer in the Columbia Slough area of north Portland. The property is beautiful - 1.5 acres of mixed open field and woods, located at the end of a road, backing wetlands with privacy on either side, established apple and pear trees, grapes and bamboo, as well as a couple retention ponds, and good-sized shed. There is a very small, beautiful home on the property (under 1000 sq ft) that is the perfect size to house us and our infant son, and is ideal since we'd like to eventually build a few tiny buildings on our property as well.
However, the property is mostly flat, it backs up to a floodplain, and there is a decent chunk of the property - maybe 1/4 acre? - located on the far end of the property that gets swampy every winter when the rains set in. Also, this region along the Columbia is sensitive to liquefaction in the event of an earthquake.
Is there any circumstance in which purchasing land near a floodplain region isn't completely foolish? Logically I would think not, but just curious what others have to say on the topic...