posted 9 years ago
I'm getting ready to set up my contour tree/swale lines on my 8+ acre pasture. The land is essentially 800ft long and 400ft wide, with the long (800ft) side heading downhill at 3-12% grade to a pond. The soil is silty loam, and there are currently no trees, just overgrown pasture and weeds. There are two primary valleys on the down slope, which I plan to eventually dam up for some small ponds along the ridge.
My plan was to space the tree lines by somewhere between 50 and 100 feet as I worked my way down the hill. The alleys will be used for sheep rotationally grazing as my primary animal, with some other animals here and there. If I do spacing every 100 feet, then the area for grazing one paddock will be 400x100, but if I do 50 feet then it will be 400x50. The latter seems maybe too long and narrow, but I'm really not sure.
Anyways, I was leaning towards 100 foot spacing between tree rows, but now I'm reading some more traditional material on silvopastures and it seems like 50ft is a pretty standard recommendation for maximum photosynthesis. This has me thinking I should do 100 foot spacing for now, and I can add rows between the rows to create 50 foot spacing in a year or 3.
So my question: Does anyone have an opinion on spacing? Or things I should be considering? I already know that my swales won't hold all the rainfall because I have a pretty massive watershed from neighbor properties that flood my land and pond anytime we get an inch or so of rain, and we get 45 inches per year on average. So I'll have a method to divert the flood water down to my lowest pond, which also floods to my neighbors pond down stream after mine fills. So I don't know whether I need to consider rainfall in my planning, since I don't see too much need in capturing more than what I'll get even with 100 foot spacing. But I could be wrong...
For the record, I plan on a 4 foot wide swale, with about a 1 or 2 foot depth, although that's still up in the air.