James Landreth wrote:I think all walnuts are pretty drought tolerant once established. But I think that English (Persian) and California black walnut would be better in dry conditions as they both evolved in arid regions (English walnut mostly hails from central Asia/the middle east, even the Carpathian may originally hail from there). They're only called English in the US because they were introduced from the UK
Depends, wild stock english walnuts are beastly strong and usually provide a decent harvest even in a dry year. Most black walnuts available in the USA are wild stock and most english walnuts available are from not wild stock. For wild stock I'd definitely say hands down the Carpathian walnut wins for a west coast sort of environment. But if the soil is fairly deep and fine grained I'd lean towards a wild black walnut having a slight win over a domestic English walnut in terms of dry year fruit set, but not by much. Blacks are more tolerant of long hot moist weather compared to the English, hence why they have done so extremely well on the east of the Mississippi.
Sure beats hickory who decides dry years mean its time to produce almost nothing. I love the taste of hickory nuts but I wish I could depend on them in tough times more.