Martin Doering wrote:
I realize that I have a burnchamber 14cm / 5.5 inch square a heatriser maybe 13cm / 5.1 square and exhaused pipes 16cm / 6.1 diameter round.
With my rocket stove, I built it with the same size - dimensions from one end to the other . . 5.5 x 5.5 burn chamber - for a 6 inch flue pipe . . . so it sounds like your sizing is right on the money . . .
Martin Doering wrote:
The heat generated in the burnchamber is simply not enough to heat the termal mass quickly.
How big is your mass, and how thick is it ? I have heard that heat travels thru a solid at about an inch an hour . . . and sure enough, when I start my stove - freezing cold (23 F) . . . it takes 6 hours of continuous burning for my mass too reach 100 F . . . that is the hottest I have EVER had my mass . . .
Martin Doering wrote:
After 5-6 hours running the gardenhouse is comfortable warm.
The draw is pretty strong and I have most of the time a rocket effect.
.
If you have a nice roaring dragon in your greenhouse, then you have done it right.
Martin Doering wrote:
I guess, if I want to have more heat, I will need a bigger burn chamber and be burning more wood.
Or try to enlarge the opening to the exhausted pipe in the hope that it may improve the draw hence burn more wood in the recent chamber.
Also a separate air intake may enhance performance, as I noticed that with an open door or window the rocket effect seems stronger, especially after a few hours burning.
If you want more heat, I would suggest building an 8 inch or 10 inch RMH - and maybe add an inch or two of mass around the "mass" to hold that extra heat . . . keeping in mind, that you have too have the same size of piping/burn chamber thru out the entire stove - to keep the dragon roaring .. .
You have stated that "The draw is pretty strong and I have most of the time a rocket effect." - which for me says its working . . . . I would guess, that if you were too enlarge the opening it would create an unbalance in the system - for example . . . if you were too add a separate air intake, it may reduce the draw to such extent that you would have smoke come up in between the wood and into the room....
EDIT : I think I misunderstood that last part, if you open a window or door in your greenhouse , and the stove rockets better, than yes, you need to add an air intake from the outside of your greenhouse directly above the wood intake - in such a way, that you can shut it off when you cap the stove for the night - if it is left open you will get a loop effect - which will keep drawing in cold air and exhausting warm air up the chimney until the entire stove is cold. - which is bad . .
Martin Doering wrote:
I was a bid confused, because I thought, there was not only a rocket effect in the burn chamber but the hot gasses burning again at the top of the barrel.
I thought the same thing, when I built my stove, and when my barrel would not get hot enough, I raised the barrel the width of 1 brick on its side (see pic) . . . from what I know now, if you drop the barrel too low, you won't get a good draw / pinching off the flow of gasses ( you have good draw so that's not it ) . . . I think I heard somewhere, that if you get it just right, you get a nice hot reburn at the top of the barrel, and if you raise it a bit higher, it moves the re burn down the sides of the barrel - getting less radiant heat from the barrel, and more heat into the mass . . If you have an infrared thermometer, you can measure the temps at the top and sides of the barrel, to get an idea of where the "hot spot" is . . .
First pic - barrel raised by one brick
second pic - infrared thermometer shows outside chimney temp - stove thermometer inside pipe shows differently.
Third pic - even though the top of the barrel can reach over 1,000 F - the infrared thermometer shows that the barrel can cool it down quite a bit (pic is at bottom of barrel) - which gives you - your nice strong draft - or "ROCKET"
This is just my opinion, if in error, please feel free too correct me !