They have been on the Soil Health bandwagon for a about a year now, and that is a very good thing. I work with them a lot, and while it is true I have battled them in court (and won), for the most part they want to do what is right. Their biggest issue is that they get Nation Wide mandates, and thus cannot change them when we all know there are microclimates. This even works in Permiculture; what Gabe Brown does could never work in Maine, but aspects of it can be taken and applied, and that is where a national wide application just falls apart. It is all or nothing.
That is the part that is changing, and while it is regional and not micro-climate like the 1936 Soil Conservation Domestic Allotment Act that formed the USDA-NRCS in the first place requires, it is much better than what we had. The problem with that is all that regional stuff ends up adding levels of complexity, and a litttle jealosy when say New England gets this, but New York and Pennsylvania do not. It is hardly a perfect system, but farming in Maine IS different than farming in New York.
Sadly I had to file a grievance against the State of Maine USDA-NRCS regarding this very issue because they determined on their own that a beginner farmer was someone that only engaged in a practice of Soil Health. While soil health is a lofty goal and very important to all aspects of farming, denying funding to a farmer who just started farming who wanted to irrigate their nursery, or
fence in their livestock, or put in a manure pit is just plain wrong. A Beginner Farmer is a beginner farmer as defined by being in farming for less than 10 years time. PERIOD. Failing to address them as such is simple discrimination. The state of Maine USDA-NRCS had no authority to do make that change in determination, nor did they have
local say as required by the 1936 Soil Conservation Domestic Allotment Act. I just wonder how many beginner farmers were denied in Maine for stuff they truly
should have been funded for.