posted 7 years ago
I don't think there is any significant difference in thermal mass and storage in a refractory brick versus a regular fired red brick, or even concrete. I expect the difference would be <5% between them. The biggest difference is the refractory brick will survive to 2000F or so, and it's ugly. Lots of mass does wonders in the woodstove surround. If you want to spice it up a bit, you could put some phase change material behind the thermal mass. Phase change material works like a thermal battery, storing energy until it's chemical threshold is reached, then it dumps out the energy very fast. You can make your own if you were a quick study in Chemistry in HS or college. Many put it in PVC pipes, but it's also sold commercially in bubble wrap sheets for green buildings behind drywall. It's very compact for it's energy storage capabilities.
As someone mentioned above, Soapstone has the largest thermal mass capability, but it's expensive.