Hmm, I get different results, somehow I end up with only approx. 2.5 tons of CaCl2. I found the following website quite useful:
http://publications.tno.nl/publication/34607613/2MLhh3/trausel-2014-review.pdf (refer to table 1) .
It states an energy density of 1600KJ/kg for CaCl2, which means 1.6 GJ/ton. As 1 GJ is approx 1 MBTU only 2.5 tons are needed, with a price tag of 2.5* 116 € --> approx 356$. (Beware, this was the second line in the table. There is also the option to use a different reaction based on CaCl2 with a lower energy density, which is the first line)
So probably the system for hydration/dehydration + storage is more expensive than the chemicals in this case.
Thanks for the mentioning of CaCl2, I wasn't aware of this. While it has a similar energy density + price tag than CaO per kg, it needs a much lower temperature for dehydration. But I guess I need to do some testing before deciding on the best chemical for this purpose.
Probably for you such a system really doesn't make sense if you can use a heatpump even during winter time. However, I still think the solution might be viable in colder climates.
Did you think of doing something else with your surplus energy? Or do you feed-in your surplus energy?
Ever thought of doing bitcoin mining (
http://www.solidgreen.co.za/bitcoin-not-batteries-converting-excess-solar-power-money/)? (Actually I don't really support the idea of bitcoins. However converting surplus (green) energy to money seems like a reasonable idea).