From my layman's perspective, this is the exact same problem that
Mike is dealing with in his compost pile. There is always ALWAYS a rate limiting reagent in a process that keeps the thing from growing exponentially. It could be water, nitrogen, in VA phoshate is a big problem, microminerals, sunlight, ad nauseum. As you manipulate one factor even if you get it right another one pops up to limit your reaction. This is the reductionist approach though, and that has problems.
I use compost and the compost tea to use the little beasties to fix some of the problems I can't see. I have a crap microscope and fifty other things I need to do (bled brakes on one vehicle this morning and have to replace a fuel pump or relay on another so thats another ? hours) and so I outsource that stuff to my beasties. I eyeball the big things and try to fix what I think are major factors- water retention/drought prevention, availability of minerals in some modest concentration,
root pruning and tree death in areas trying to succeed to junk forest. Those are all super shotgun things. I can build those in at scale and do no testing. I can get my head around those too.
For the rest, I assume the micro and macro beasties are going to figure it out. My early priority was animals on the land, rotating and recovering. We had
chickens way before I was comfortable with it. The rotation is time consuming, but I think it has paid off. After the #$@# preimeter
fence which is consuming my life, it will allow more time consuming sheep rotation. But the amount of beasties goes way up, and I control the rotation and recovery (unlike the hoof rats eating my silvipasture to nubs every 3 weeks). I predict in two years this will be crazy verdant. The sheep will provide the disturbance this place has lacked. When that isn't enough, in come the piggies or cows or something.
The compost and compost tea seems like an accelerant, just like throwing down nitrogen. But it has a spectrum of accelerants in fast and slow forms, so there is no "bloom and bust". How is this different that providing the elements of a compost tea (by my reading: biota, energy source, mineral source, oxygen) in the field to react at a slower rate (because oxygen is limited versus the tea brewer)? I think you can get there either way, just takes longer with the in place model. How much longer? I think that depends. I subsoil the chips in (This is 6" of chips initially) down to 2' (!) with a subsoiler on keylines I had to fabricate myself (thanks Travis for making me acquire another time suck skill) that also is ripping out the sweetgum roots trying to re-establish the junk forest. This solves about three issues- water retention, low oxygenation at depth, low carbon/energy molecules at depth, low mineral supply in the A horizon.
So I am disturbing very greatly right now, then I have to move the biome forward. I could use compost tea but I am going with herd animals. I get a yield out of it, and it's good for the land including the inhabitants. I think the OP is in the same bind, do you put out animals before the biome is recovered?
Alan Savory would probably say ASAP, but at a low density, which is hard to pay off the fencing. The tea might give enough forage to make it work in a season (that's what I was planning on doing before I got all the chips) with cheap annuals like sorghum sudan and sesbania. Huge disturbance followed by annuals followed by the perennials that naturally make their way in like Greg Judy and
Joel Salatin have documented. I think that model is well proven. Joel has interns and can afford the up-front fencing and management but I don't have the time. Greg has the system and the acreage to run a huge amount of
cattle for a couple days (and he seeds annuals before they go in the first time). I like the Greg Judy approach greatly!