Hello Everyone,
I wanted to throw in a few lines for a discussion, primarily to share my process of inquire and the observations i made into trying to materialise my
permaculture dream.
I think many of you here will relate having come across the same conclusions and problems.
The
experience is based mainly on the situation in Southern Europe (France, Italy, Portugal) as I think they have similar laws... or differ slightly.
I lived and worked in Oceania (NZ, Australia) but cannot relate to that environment, as laws seem to more relaxed or just different.
My conclusion and observation is personal and your experience / feedback very welcome.
I know however that many of us come across this issues when trying to make the big leap and get their own property started.
a) most of us have no or very limited knowledge about where and how to buy
land + housing (you can't build on agricultural land yes some do but it's not my intention)
b) most of us want just to get GOOD, GOOD land and focus less on housing (tiny houses, a camper, a yurt, eventually a building) but this is subject to
local regulation and laws (In Italy tiny houses are not allowed, neither composting toilets!!)
c) point b brings you to point c , which throws you in a dilemma between choosing an "average" land option and "mediocre" housing... you basically have to have a roof over your head and sewage system and land that is not overly degraded. Not the ideal solution, rather a compromise i think.
d) once you have done the "compromised" choice you are left with lots of learning, repairing and hard, hard work, not ideal from a pc point of view!!
The criterias to buy land
should be primarily focused on: ACCESS (roads) ,
WATER , STRUCTURAL POSITIONS, NOT OVERLY PENDENT (Hard work) etc.etc.
The paradox is as following:
Good
permaculture land might be available but be agricultural land and you have no permit to build.
In
permaculture you want to have your roof and housing around your productive system and live synergetically not "drive to farm" as conventional farmers often do.
So the real estate falls short in that because most people see farm as an extractive process, not a synergetic one.
This is the first dilemma in the real estate we all encounter, more or less - I think.
Other points worth mentioning:
Land for building permit is not for permaculturist, but rather "I want my villa, pool and some herb garden" while working in the
city. basically the focus is more on the House and barely on the surroundings and productivity etc.etc.
-> It makes little sense to buy a land with building permit if you have no good soil or general a lack of good design potential.
-> This land usually is very expensive too, because as mentioned, it is sold for other reasons than to grow regenerative systems.
So land with building permit falls out of OUR equation, as we are not interested in the lifestyle / and cost a priori.
Our priorities are ELSEWHERE, right.
What is left?
Traditional Farms, they are often huge monoculture degraded listings, and hard to convert for the average
permie (unless your
Joel Salatin LOL).
-> Most of us have not the monies to buy this huge farms let alone manage them with tractors and machineries we do not have. this could work in a cooperative fashion, or if you have farming background, but then again you really need to start from scratch unless your dad was as said a farmer and gifted you lots of tools and skills.
What remains is possibly the only but viable alternative.
You can get a fair amount of land in some remote areas with an old barn, abandoned small farmhouse, country house, and possibly the additional option of buying agricultural land (keep that in mind).
The detail of how land is divided (1 ha forest, 2 ha farmland, 3000m2 bulding) is very important, you don't want forests only, neither farmland. Ideally a mix of both.
This seems to me the best option for a
permaculture project here in EUROPE, because:
you can live temporarily in some yurt, tent and even tiny house while renovating the house to its bare minimum while also getting the soil and water - plant systems back in place.
The pros are: for a relative good price you have already standing walls, maybe a roof, windows, or more to renovate (costy yes) but no time pressure! Ironic once you have a house with sewage system you can move in the land, declare to live there while housing in your alternative option (tiny house, container, yurt).
After lots of thinking and research I decided to move in this direction , as the other options seem very difficult and a burden.
In an ideal scenario I would just focus primarily on GOOD GOOD LAND and live TINY for first YEARS while eventually expanding also House-wise.
BUT Good Land is mostly found in agricultural listings, while Land with building permit is too expensive and not destined for the goal as explained above.
My next steps will be to
a) Get to know an area by living there for months and study the criterias of properties and regions very well (access, soil, structure, water, sun/shade, latitude, altitude, other key factors)
b) Choose a property on sale with min. of 2-3 ha farm and forest land and a old country house in need to renovate.
c) Once I make the purchase (wish me luck) start to work on the priorities of land regeneration and the housing aspect (i find both important)
The question I would like to throw here for people that have done this steps already:
-What are your greatest regrets once you have purchased property ...
- not
enough ha of land?? you focused too much on the house or viceversa not enough on it?
- neighbours?
-How much ha are ideal for you, assuming you had at least purchased 1-2 ha of land ?
-What would you do differently !!
I'm in the process of establishing a project in Central Italy and had to go trough this brainstorming and analysis.
Happy to hear from you if you have valid input and feedback, of course also other global regions apply.
Cheers!