I love the deep watering wand, and the inverted self-shaded hollow moisture condensers. These are solid ideas, as is putting a watering reservoir upflow of each tree.
I have some observations. I feel that one could maximize the potential for soil surface moisture condensers if the main structural element was an unglazed clay pot, like a terra cotta flower pot, complete with drainage hole.
One could probably make a really white goatmilk paint, or use some other really white pigment, on the exterior of the pot to keep the inside of the upside-down pot cool, so as to increase its capacity to condense moisture out of the air. Airflow from the slight chimney effect would then evapourate condensate, cooling the terra cotta, maintaining its ability to condense moisture out of the air.
If opaque stones (probably not quartz) were stacked or piled up around inverted flower pots in a similar manner, with an mind to airflow, they would also keep the pot cool, creating what is, in effect, a miniature airwell.
I was actually wondering about things like lengths of small culvert half-buried, widthwise, in the ground as a sort of ground-based heat exchanger. If you could bury most of one footing deep enough, what remained above ground would be cooled by the ground itself. Pair that with, say, a hedgerow or some other type of planting that would shade the structure from
solar gain, and you have ground-cooled, plant-shaded metal exchanger/condensers in rows, condensing water out of the air whenever it's there, delivering water like a drip line.
But you need moisture in the air for that to work. I love the reservoir angle, but I would use pairs of terra cotta flower pots with a plug put into place in the drainage hole of one, and the two pots glued together into a single vessel with clay of some kind (from the ground, hopefully), rim-to-rim, with the plugged bottom drainage hole downward, and the top drainage hole acting as the reservoir opening.
I take my paired flowerpot vessels and bury them upflow, or uphill, of my trees. They are a good slow-release mechanism, though in some cases I end up dropping wicks into the reservoir and curling the ends of those around the dripline of trees and shrubs to augment what was moving through the unglazed pottery.
As to underground composting, I love it. I would, however, keep it to the dripline, or perhaps between the reservoir and tree, right next to the water source. While I would place wood at the bottom of a particularly deep tree hole, this would be for drought resistance from establishment. Having a buried nurse log beneath it would regulate moisture all on its own. I wouldn't build a compost within the hole and then cap it with a tree. I like to think of it as incenting the roots to seek moisture and nutrients away from the tree, deeply into the nurse log, for instance, or outward for the compost nutrients and water.
As to less-intensive methods, you could get a lot of 2" or larger river stone and pile them in at least two, maybe three layers atop the soil surrounding your trees, the top layer would again keep the bottom layers cool, causing any moisture flowing through to condense out into the lower layers and drip onto the sheltered soil, which itself would evapourate less moisture.
A big rock on the sunward side of the stone mulch, just large enough to cast a shadow most times of the day over most of the stone mulch, would keep it cooler, thereby condensing out more moisture. Drought-tolerant plantings on the sunward side capable of shading out the stone mulch would also work. I would suggest drought-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacteria host shrubs, something that will also tolerate your wet season, and can be pruned regularly for mulch and to control the
solar aspect.
Getting plants or other structures to shade the mulch from the afternoon on at very least should allow you to maximise the capture of the dew cycle.
One last thought; one technique to get water from the environment in survival situations is to put collection bags around entire tree branches to capture the products of their respiration. If you could tent your trees, you might be courting other problems if they're too tightly wrapped, but otherwise, a tent structure pinned to the ground around a tree or trees might serve to trap some of that tree sweat in the air trapped around the trees, preventing them from drying out so much. And again, in cases where the tent membrane cools more than the ambient air, inside or out, there will be condensation if there's moisture in the air.
So yeah, if you could tent them and still allow for adequate airflow within the tent(s), the severity of your issues would decrease. You have hothouse greenhouses for four-season growing in temperate climates, why not moisthouse greenhouses, to keep our plants growing through seasonal drought?
-CK