The word Putrefaction comes from the same Latin
roots (put-/pot-) providing us the word Power. Fundamentally, putrefaction is decomposition, and not toxicity. What we call organic compost (organic recycling), is essentially the positive culmination of decomposition (as active principle). In a healthy, natural environment (with a minimum of soil, minerals and vegetation), decomposition is the careful, diligent separation of mixed organic materials further built and appointed by both macro and micro organisms to provide accordingly to the specific niche in which the process happens.
Land, along with
water, can't be poisoned (because both of them are the origin and providers of everything that would theoretically poison it). Single organisms are poisoned. Land and Water aren't organisms, they are environments, holding and promoting the life of numerous individual species, single organisms and particular niches in which both species and individuals function and relate optimally.
Where I live there are bins designated to fresh organic material and rancid organic material. The bins for fresh material take plants from the
yard and solid plant scraps from the kitchen or any other production of food made from solid plants only and non-oiled papers. The bins for rancid organic material take oiled papers, oiled food scrap preparations, cooking oils and dead animals or dead animal parts (either cooked or uncooked).
Both those bins have their materials directed to two different compost systems. The fresh material system works with a superficial compost, above the ground level. The rancid material works with a subsurface compost, also called landfill, constructed as a hole or ditch. In both fresh and rancid cases, constant human-led management is necessary (providing numerous regular and full-time jobs that involve both hands-on maintenance and continued scientific certification for niche-appropriate adjustment and healthy organic development).
Now, to consider a brand new introduction of these two systems to any locality, not just the holding environment and it's various relative niches have to be carefully assessed but also the actual physical spaces available to include the entire mass of organic material rendered through a standard local consumption pattern (flexible by season). In my county there are endless available private lots which could be used for exposed (fresh) compost production and contained (rancid) compost production, both of which are not (and in effect cannot) be intrusive to the neighborhoods in which they would take place.
You could have a restaurant on one lot, and two lots next to it for fresh and rancid compost. You could have a hospital or a veterinary instead of restaurant, you could have a plant nursery, you could have a kindergarten school, you could have a farm, an urban garden, you could have a park, or a sports field, you could have an apartment complex, you could have a residential house or condominium. In essence, you could have anything at all next to those two compost systems, because they would be the stabilizers and promoters for a functioning economy based on regular (seasonal) consumption patterns. Soil regeneration. Food reallocation. Varied occupation.