Hi Brad
Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. It is a challenge, and I just found out that my budget will be half of what I was expecting... so I'll be building a lot smaller: 16 x 20'. Then I may add on next year or over time. I'll see.
I absolutely cannot dig into the ground at all if I want to live in this cabin this year (which I do) and don't want to have to build to strict code (which I don't). The cabin's future site is very dry, but the landscape is generally very watery and we have high humidity being so close to the ocean and all of its attendant inlets. The problem for me with concrete is that I have not seen even one home anywhere here where the concrete is ever dry if it has any contact with the ground at all- new homes, custom-built with extra attention to staving off water leakage... doesn't seem to matter; water gets in, up, through, etc... And yes, it would be a major pain to get concrete back there; I don't want to make a huge road to accommodate a big truck or even a small one. I like a walking trail back from the parking close to the road, so the cabin will be tucked away. This is also why I won't be hiring a well-driller. I don't mind enough width for a horse or an atv, but I really want to avoid wide driveways all the way back to where I'm building about 450' from the dirt road). And carting concrete by the wheelbarrow-full also seems more hassle than its worth if I can just haul beams through the brush with an atv. And pavers.
I know that strawbale can work very well here; good hat, good
boots. There are several bale homes closer to the ocean even, but they have the wet concrete basements that everyone seems to have, and I don't want a basement at all, so I can't look for their solutions to bale-building for that. So it's the boots I'm concerned about. If I can figure out a way to build completely off the ground, that would be so excellent and solve a lot of problems all at once. The other option that most people take here is to build on skid, but with construction lumber or log. Both of those would be fine for me but I really want the qualities of straw. My thoughts are that straw is not too much heavier if at all, than the 12-16" logs used for homes here, some of which are on skid foundations as well. So I think the weight is still not a huge issue as long as there's enough reinforcement.
Anyway, I think that with my building being so reduced in size, my skid foundation plans would be fine. So if I had waited just a few days, my dilemma wouldn't ever have existed... 16x20' can't go too wrong in too many places, haha.
As for preferences for materials, I definitely prefer to use local materials, and I could skip the pavers as well, but I also have to consider that I have about 7 weeks to get the foundation and shell of the cabin up and moderately habitable (even if in camping style). It will be much faster to get beams on pavers than anything else that I can think of. The
trees here are water-acclimated and even lumber suppliers use the local
wood in place of pressure treated stuff, which has fallen out of favour here in general, not just because it's toxic, but also because it is also unnecessary.
So, I'll build on a four-20'-beam-on-pad foundation. I lived in a 2-storey log cabin in Yukon (18x20) on tree stumps placed on concrete pavers at 6' intervals. It was fine and had been there for over a decade with no shifting. Of
course, even though there is heaving there, the permafrost reduces it significantly, which is not the case here. I am so unfamiliar with this environment... I'm sure I am going to learn a lot as I go, and rely on lots of book-learnin'... and hoping it applies! Building begins in May!
I am going to obtain a copy of that book you recommended and take it as an expense, unless I can get it from the library. Thanks, Brad.
Wish me good luck!