• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • Nancy Reading
  • r ranson
  • John F Dean
  • Timothy Norton
  • paul wheaton
  • Jay Angler
stewards:
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Anne Miller
  • Tereza Okava
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
gardeners:
  • M Ljin
  • Matt McSpadden
  • Megan Palmer

Solar powered air generator

 
Posts: 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey guy
Was thinking in line of using a solar powered compressor to tun an motor generator which charges a batery faster. The air from compressor is run to a tesla turbine .
Is this possible and how efficient
 
pollinator
Posts: 3847
Location: Marmora, Ontario
597
4
hugelkultur dog forest garden fungi trees rabbit urban wofati cooking bee homestead
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Welcome to Permies, Hillary.

I don't think it works that way. The transfer losses would kill the idea. It's more efficient to charge a battery with solar rather than to use solar to compress air to turn a turbine to run a generator to charge a battery.

I believe this falls under the KISS rule.

-CK
 
Posts: 762
Location: Morocco
109
cat forest garden trees solar wood heat woodworking
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Every conversion means losses. They can be anywhere between 90% to 10%.

Here are my guesstimated efficiencies for your proposed setup:
Solar -> electricity: 15% (solar panels)
electrical -> mechanical 80% (motor)
mechanical -> pneumatic 30% (compressor)
pneumatic -> mechanical: 30% (turbine)
mechanical -> electrical: 80% (generator)

That makes a total of 0.15 * 0.8 * 0.3 * 0.3 * 0.8 = 0.00864 (0.8% efficiency). So for every 1000W of solar input, you get 8W out.
This is compared to just hooking up the solar panels to the battery (15% efficiency -> 150W output for 1000W solar input).
 
Posts: 186
Location: 7b desert southern Idaho
22
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What is a “solar powered compressor “?
 
Chris Kott
pollinator
Posts: 3847
Location: Marmora, Ontario
597
4
hugelkultur dog forest garden fungi trees rabbit urban wofati cooking bee homestead
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I would guess that "solar powered compressor" means a conventional air compressor deriving its power from a solar setup of some sort. I don't know if it's possible, or good for any type of motor used for compressor applications to be driven by any kind of variable or intermittent power, so it might not even be possible to have an electric motor-operated air compressor directly powered by solar power without already having a battery bank and associated infrastructure.

I think, all things considered, that including an air compressor in the loop serves no purpose but to waste energy. If you need to run an air compressor for your other operations, and if your solar setup has a high-enough capacity, by all means run it off your solar. But as I mentioned above, all those conversions kill your efficiency.

-CK
 
pollinator
Posts: 967
Location: Central Ontario
191
kids dog books chicken earthworks cooking solar wood heat woodworking homestead
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Sebastian Köln wrote:Every conversion means losses. They can be anywhere between 90% to 10%.

Here are my guesstimated efficiencies for your proposed setup:
Solar -> electricity: 15% (solar panels)
electrical -> mechanical 80% (motor)
mechanical -> pneumatic 30% (compressor)
pneumatic -> mechanical: 30% (turbine)
mechanical -> electrical: 80% (generator)

That makes a total of 0.15 * 0.8 * 0.3 * 0.3 * 0.8 = 0.00864 (0.8% efficiency). So for every 1000W of solar input, you get 8W out.
This is compared to just hooking up the solar panels to the battery (15% efficiency -> 150W output for 1000W solar input).

hi sebastian you are right except for the efficiency of solar panels. A 1000 watt array would produce 1000 watts of electricity. The 15 percent efficiency number refers to how much of the solar energy hitting the panel is converted to electricityso your true energy harvested would be 57.6 Watt hours of the original 1000 Watt hours using your other efficiency numbers...
Cheers, David
 
Posts: 14
Location: 106 Gaither Drive, Mount Laurel NJ, 08054
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi, yes I with you their is more loss of energy as compare to directly charge the battery with solar energy because your ultimately goal is to charge the battery.
 
I think he's gonna try to grab my monkey. Do we have a monkey outfit for this tiny ad?
Rocket Mass Heater Resources Wiki
https://permies.com/w/rmh-resources
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic