posted 3 years ago
My sister lives in rural Kansas. I spoke to my BIL and he was going on about Kansas farms "feeding the world." I went over some of the options permaculture allows, including higher income but smaller harvest because of diversification, and so on. I went out there last fall, and they were saying they haven't gotten any rains for 3 months (apparently the rain followed me in, because I was driving through a downpour). But if these properties were properly handled they wouldn't NEED the rain. Catching and holding the water rather than diverting it, planting tree avenues, swales, and so on, would make the land drought tolerant.
The problem isn't the land, it's a need to change attitudes. In order to "feed the world" they need fertilizers, and pesticides, and big tractors, big machines and technology, ever advancing technology that is more expensive every year. They need the fields to be dry in the spring and fall to accommodate the machines, which means diverting the water rather than catching and holding it. So their fields dry up because they don't get the rain they need, due to the fact that they drained off all the water.
The "feed the world" attitude is hurting more than it's helping. I would love to live out there, take a 5 acre piece of property and turn it into a drought tolerant, abundant food production area. Maybe if people saw it working, some of the small property owners would follow. As it is, no one wants "Kansas" because it's flyover country, so nothing ever changes because they don't have any examples to follow.
New location. Zone 6b, acid soil, 30+ inches of water per year.
https://growingmodernlandraces.thinkific.com/?ref=b1de16
Growingmodernlandraces.com affiliate