posted 3 years ago
Well, I do know it's a lot easier / more common to get annexed than vice-versa.
It might help if you shared the country & city you're working with - a lot of users here aren't from the USA and you didn't give any details.
So Im going to assume you're in the USA
In Washington State, either a petition must be submitted to the city signed by the requisite number of voters or the city council must pass a resolution calling for an election, followed by a city-wide election in which a super-majority of city voters must approve the de-annexation. If there’s a boundary review board in the county, the proposed de-annexation is subject to potential review by that board.
The process of getting a petition on the ballet involves calling for a vote, and I’m not sure why a city council would want to pass a resolution to have an election on whether to de-annex a single person's property, as elections cost money and the city would foot the bill for a de-annexation election.
De-annexing affects the city's electoral voting rights negatively in US elections, so it's super rare for it to succeed.
Cities need to be able to count on stable boundaries. The de-annexation process, with its high hurdle, helps to keep them stable.
--
My biggest question is: Why is it a problem?
Why do you 'want out'?
When was your property annexed - before you lived there, or during your life there?