John F Dean wrote:I am not sure of your intents, but I am a long time amateur astronomer. You use the word warm. Observatories are not heated. Heat will cause atmospheric disturbances that will mess with the image quality. I question if the small hole at the top of the yurt will serve much real purpose. Stars appear to move across the night sky as the earth rotates. I question if they will stay within view of that hole long enough for useful observing.
There are relatively inexpensive options to consider. The value of an observatory, from my perspective, is to serve as a wind break and to block out stray light. I would consider some solid fencing. Maybe an 8x8 area. Going up the ladder in cost a large plastic water tank with a slot cut out could also work. The water tank could be rotated as needed. Finally, it is common to use sheds with roofs that slide off on wood or metal rails.
Oh thanks! I had no idea that they were not heated. My camera equipment isn't really great in the cold, and neither am I. :D But that's cool to know about distortion.
Light pollution isn't a problem here on our place. We're almost a mile from artificial light at the top of our ridge.
The little observatory pods look similar in size to yurt skylights. That's why I asked. That, and not knowing that the warmth would impact the instruments.