Yes, it is remarkable to see people such as Carl Sagan testify against it from a bygone age. There is nothing new under the sun though... Ages ago it was rampant deforestation on the Japanese mountainsides which today cannot be touched after reforestation. Environmentally, it's always something... Turning Egypt from a breadbasket into a smoldering desert.
I believe that the prowess of technology has made a lot of people apathetic. In the '70s, you might imagine easily living without a lot of tech. These days, not so much.
Of
course, there is solid logic and reasoning that to diminish fossil fuels right now would basically squeeze the very bottom of humanity off the cliff, from increase heating costs (unless those people were to shift to utilizing
RMH), to increased prices in food, the modern green movement, from a political, economic, and functional perspective, has a great amount of issues and propaganda attached to it. It is entirely inauthentic compared to some of the notable activists in the '70s, whose influences have likely ended up right here on this website.
I have come to believe the solution is what is being done right here, right now... Get these ideas into the minds of more people, and from there into their hands. People that learn about these topics often end up telling everyone then can.
It will become dystopian if it remains politicized, and it's already apparent, such as airlines displaying your fossil fuel emissions that you cause because you bought one of
their tickets.
What is the baseline, logically, easiest way to reduce the total global
carbon footprint? Well, unfortunately, it would be to
remove carbon footprints... squeeze the poor off the end of the cliff. It's ever so slightly easier from a business perspective than building a
RMH.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."