Something mildly curious in the Center for Science in the Public Interest Form 990 for 2011 - One of their many stated goals is to "conduct an annual, nationwide food day to promote delicious, healthy and affordable food that is produced in a sustainable humane way."
On its face that sounds like something we should all be getting behind. So I wonder where the conflict comes in, that these people apparently do not agree with the methods for achieving the shared goals.
I've only just started looking into this one, I will be back as I find more.
So, here is a link at ActivistCash.com with something of a review of the CSPI
http://www.activistcash.com/organizations/13-center-for-science-in-the-public-interest/
Let me summarize that the author is not favorably impressed.
And another link, with some pretty devastating information regarding how CSPI pursues its goals and how science really is not part of the process
http://www.alcoholfacts.org/CSPInoSciencePubInterest.html
At this point I am personally satisfied that this is a lobbyist organization with no scientific integrity and an agenda that runs contrary to my interests. I am also pretty well prepared to believe that they have no idea at all what is involved in sustainable agriculture, but they are pretty sure that some things are "icky".
And regarding Ms DeWaal - what bothers me is that her education is as a lawyer, not a scientist of any flavor at all. A lawyer really is not qualified to give advise on what is or is not a safe agricultural practice. How to write a regulation to require practices that have been identified by those qualified to determine what is safe, yes, but to make such determinations? Absolutely not.