• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Anne Miller
  • Nicole Alderman
  • r ranson
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Mike Haasl
  • paul wheaton
stewards:
  • Joylynn Hardesty
  • Dave Burton
  • Joseph Lofthouse
master gardeners:
  • jordan barton
  • Greg Martin
gardeners:
  • Carla Burke
  • Ash Jackson
  • Kate Downham

Grammarly and other grammar aids

 
Posts: 87
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

r ranson wrote:In my research, I haven't found a single person in the publishing industry that thought prescriptive grammar described rules of how to use the language.  A style guide is in the name - a guide.  Grammatical guides are also guides.

 

If you happen to have a background in academia or journalism, you will probably be familiar the AP Stylebook or the Chicago Manual of Style. Those are great resources for writing in general, particularly for grammar and syntax,

Write the Docs
https://www.writethedocs.org/guide/writing/style-guides/



[bolded, above, is mine]

I have an academic background and I was required to purchase and use the Chicago Manual of Style. In my day, it was called Turabian after the now long dead first author. It still has a section on grammar. The latest edition asked Bryan Garner to do the grammar section. Are you familiar with the CMS and B Garner? Above, from Write the Docs group notes that CMS and the AP Stylebook both have sections on grammar and syntax.
 
master steward & author
Posts: 20690
Location: Left Coast Canada
5770
books chicken cooking fiber arts sheep writing
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It sounds like you are saying that in a class you took, you were required to follow the guidelines in the Turabian (Chicago) Manual of Style.

Teachers/departments/universities choose one style guide to teach students...
... how to follow instructions (students sometimes have opinions that their way is the right way and learning that they can't always have their way is often part of the curriculum.)
... how to be internally consistent throughout a document since this is pretty important if they want to make money with the written word
... that punctuation and style can have a huge effect on legibility and meaning
... that the teachers have a hard time dealing with inconstancy in citation and style.  If every member of the class (and some classes have 400+ students) follows the same style, things are much easier to mark.  

I'm not seeing how that equates to universal rules for all written English.  

What I hear you say is that there are no universal rules for the English language.  This makes sense.

However, it doesn't follow that style guides are wrong.  It also doesn't follow that style guides are laying down universal rules.  Maybe part of the proof you are offering is missing.  

Then again, you do seem to be talking from an academic point of view.  It's the same point of view they taught in university here.  I can totally understand why you are saying this.  

But since then, I've spent a lot of time talking with people in the publishing industry.  Their point of view is very different than the one taught in university.  I'm terribly ad hominem when confronted with two contradictory points of view.  I look at the people exposing these views and ask "which is the most productive?" My linguistic and English teachers at uni produce a paper every four years and derive their income from teaching.  Many of the publishers, printers, and authors I talked to produce enough work each year to derive their income from their writing skills.  Since this is a matter of language, I also asked, "who is expressing themselves in a way that most people can understand?"

I had one prof that used to say "if you have to resort to jargon and long words to explain a concept, you do not understand it."  She had us rewrite our essays until it could be understood by a ten-year-old.  

 
gardener
Posts: 1726
Location: South of Capricorn
664
dog rabbit urban cooking writing homestead ungarbage
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I am training an intern and thought of this thread today when giving her a resource for those moments of doubt when you can`t remember.... is it affect or effect? or any of those stinky situations where you're not sure of which word you mean.

https://ludwig.guru/
It works like the Brigham Young corpus (which I love but is time consuming just to settle a quick question), but doesn't involve logging in and to my experience is just as good. Paste in your dubious sentence and it will bring up similar usage from mainstream sources. It appears to be mostly US English but I haven't tested it extensively.
 
Terry Byrne
Posts: 87
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Tereza Okava wrote:I am training an intern and thought of this thread today when giving her a resource for those moments of doubt when you can`t remember.... is it affect or effect? or any of those stinky situations where you're not sure of which word you mean.



One of the best guides is The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage. It is not a word dictionary, it is a point by point grammar dictionary.
 
She still doesn't approve of my superhero lifestyle. Or this shameless plug:
Wild Homesteading - Work with nature to grow food and start/build your homestead
https://permies.com/t/96779/Wild-Homesteading-Work-nature-grow
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic