Thekla McDaniels wrote:Most people do, but once you stop trusting whoever it is, that’s in charge, it is hard to go back!
Yup, there's a lot of that lost trust thing going around. (BTW, we have another broken water supply line in our neighborhood, as of Friday - this one appears to be a service lateral - which is yet another indicator of a failing system, and gives further impetus to get a potable water treatment system of my own set up.)
Thekla McDaniels wrote:It’s probably the ceramic filter, the black Berkey filter. The one that even removes viruses and other particles that size.
Here's what Berkey offers: Black Berkey filter elements (probably significantly consisting of carbon or activated charcoal, since the Black Berkeys are specified to deal with a bunch of nasty chemical contaminants); Fluoride and Arsenic Reduction elements; and Super Sterasyl ceramic elements.
Presumably, a dealer would be able to clarify (perhaps even quantify) the relative performance of the two main types (Black and Super Sterasyl). I can't see a nice tabular comparison of them on the Berkey website, though I may just be missing it. Much of the website info regarding their filters is a catechism, of sorts - question and short form answer.
And, for any who care, here's a link to Berkey's filing against the US EPA:
https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/berkey-international-puerto-rico-complaint.pdf
Though I haven't read it in its entirety, Berkey's assertion is just as Tommy stated. The silver is used in the filter elements to kill the captured organisms, presumably preventing the filter from being colonized by critters and so impairing the performance due to accumulated biofilm.
From paragraph 39 of the filing:
"Berkey filters containing silver are properly classified as treated articles because the
silver is part of a registered pesticide that is used to preserve the mechanical filtration maze itself.
The silver does not act a pesticide for purposes of killing waterborne pathogens within the water,
nor does Berkey make any such claim."
What would have been next - classifying my copper farmhouse sink as a pesticide? But I digress...
Re my NASA comment
A puff piece on commercialization/technology transfer of NASA's silver ion water treatment methods:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210717054937/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020080111/downloads/20020080111.pdf
And a more detailed technical article on the technology, with two embodiments given, and a discussion of some of the challenges faced for long term (space flight) use:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240716082039/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160007509/downloads/20160007509.pdf
I posted the versions from Archive, because NASA's website was slow to respond.