But on the subject of willow, I was told by an old bloke "willow keeps you warm three times. Once when you're cutting it, the second time when you burn it, and the third time when you're jumping all over the hearth rug stamping the sparks out." It was the demonstration that had me in hysterics.
I agree with the point made by others , use the dead wood and windfall if possible for fuel. We have been removing tons of standing dead spruce from a plantation made by the previous generation (60 years old) these are bone dry and they are light and easy to handle . The long seasoning makes the spruce a much better fuel. In many cases the bark is gone. Burns hot and lasts really long, mostly because it is left round.
In the last week we have filled 8 cubic yard bulk bags with the dry wood. These are then kept tarped for future use/ sale.
We keep 2 houses going with firewood, and rarely cut any live trees. The 25 acre spruce plantation provides a surplus. We are stockpiling now because we want to clean the area up to let more sunlight in.
The ground is good farmland and was pasture and fields for over a hundred years prior to being planted with red spruce in 1960.
The plan is to gradually transition first to woodland pasture (hogs or sheep) and then to open farmland again. The spruce has had its day, most is overmature and dying, which it does in our area at about age 60. Saleable logs are being hauled out this winter. Leaving oversized and young trees and the scattered ash to rebound.
In areas cleaned up in the past 5 years the pasture grass has grown back thick and shiny .
This is how the land has inspired our work.. the old ditches are still there , and they still drain the area. All it takes is a lot of work !!
Oak, white, or red
Wild Black Cherry, the lumber tree not the fruit
Maple, I'd plant sugar maple for dual use
Apple and Crab Apple make good firewood, but you don't get the long straight lengths
Elm is hard to split
Locust is harder to split
Ash and Poplar aren't good heat generators, comparatively.
Aspen is like balsa wood.
Any of the evergreens fill your chimney with creosote, so would be a good choice if you want to burn down your place.
I think I'd plant Walnut, Cherry, or Oak if I were planting firewood. In about 75 years I'd sell off the Walnut and burn the limbs. Or I'd sell off Walnut futures in 50 years or so.
I'd guess that it'd take 25 years to get a face cord from a hardwood tree.
My favorite firewood is Cherry. It's easy to split, it looks nice, and doesn't give you a splinter every time you pick a firelog up.
Biggest advantage is that when you cut it down it starts sending up suckers again. I have one here that made 35 new stems.
So it is a very good tree for sustainablility. Not all trees regenerate like this.
Given the quality of ashwood both for fuel and crafts it would be a very good choice for "tree farming". The new stems are generally straight .
I use a billhook to trim off lower branches and have lots of these clumps of regenerated "coppiced" ash.
In the UK they have tradionally "farmed" ash this way , alot of it going into rustic furniture etc.
Whether or not it will grow where you live is another question. We only have it growing in certain areas , mostly wet ground .
I will try to get a photo and upload of coppiced ash.
I see alot of comments that creosote is a problem and dangerous.
One should alway burn with lots of airflow and clean combustion using only dry firewood.
Green wood , poor draught and "choking" the stove - that is lighting it and slamming the door and closing the draught- will give creosote build up .
Burn it hot and when you have a good bed of coals close it down .
Chimneys should be swept /inspected yearly as most of us know.
The problem is alot of people are so cheap on wood they try to heat with a "smolder fire" and get by with one stick a day or some such foolishness...
I Know people who use this method and when they open the stove door the creosote is dripping down. Regardless of wood species, its the method of stove use.
Mark Deichmann wrote:I see alot of comments that creosote is a problem and dangerous... The problem is alot of people are so cheap on wood they try to heat with a "smolder fire" and get by with one stick a day or some such foolishness... I Know people who use this method and when they open the stove door the creosote is dripping down. Regardless of wood species, its the method of stove use.
Although I have limited personal experience with wood stoves - I have helped tend other people's stoves on occasion, but not yet relied on one as the primary heat source in my own home - I will offer an opinion here. I agree that the method of stove use is the primary problem, as opposed to choice of firewood species.
But I don't think this is mostly because people are "cheap" on wood use, but rather that the nature of conventional wood stoves suggests this type of behavior. Most people prefer a steady, comfortable temperature; yet maintaining a full-throated, clean burn produces a lot of heat very quickly. So, you overheat. Or, as a result, you instead build multiple short but intense fires throughout the day and let things cool off in between. So, your temperature oscillates noticeably. Either way, it is hard to maintain the desired, steady, mild temperature with a wood stove without using the "smolder fire" method and thus producing more creosote (not to mention other pollutants).
In case you hadn't guessed where I'm going with this, this should not be read as an endorsement of dirty-burning wood stove methods, but rather as an argument for rocket mass heaters!
Osage Orange (Hedge) Maclura pomifera 4,845 30.0
Hop Hornbeam (Ironwood) Ostrya virginiana 4,250 26.4
Persimmon, American Diospyros virginiana 4,165 25.8
Hickory, Shagbark Carya ovata 4,080 25.3
Dogwood, Pacific Cornus nuttallii 3,995 24.8
Holly, American Ilex Opaca 3,995 24.8
Birch, Black Betula lenta 3,910 24.2
Oak, White Quercus alba 3,910 24.2
Madrone, Pacific (Arbutus) Arbutus menziesii 3,825 23.7
Oak, Post Quercus stellata 3,825 23.7
It's at: this site.
Apple is tied with white ash and Oregon Mrtyle (?). and better than black and red Maple. The Osage Orange which we called monkey ball trees when I was kid are on top! also the Ironwood and Persimmon also surprise me. I thought Ironwood was only used for survey stakes in the 1800's, after the survey trees were cut down. Another quality firewood tree that surprises me is #5 Pacific Dogwood. One I notice that's missing is Poplar. We used to be stuck with Silver Poplar at fishing camps east of the northern tip of Lake Superior. It would freeze overnight some nights and you could see the fire in the box stove was burning but couldn't feel the heat.
I looked this site up after looking for my Oregon chain saw book/ manual which I couldn't find. That manual also listed firewoods by BTU's. I notice that some of tied trees match in BTU's and also the weights match.
Her is a photo of a solid brick fireplace on stone base that has a large heatexchanging hood in brick. It is freestanding in front of the flue and located in the center of the house. The beauty of this design is the amount of light and radiant heat it gives and how the whole unit absorbs and re radiates heat . ONe of the best I have ever built.