Agree serial/chapter/section audio reviews are a good learning tool. (And thank you, Paul and Jocelyn and others, for taking the time to do and share them.)
Reviews can help interested persons decide whether or not to read a book, or what parts, can help readers focus their reading (if the review is read first), and can help readers reinforce, retain and sometimes examine more critically what they've read (when the review is read afterward). The latter can lead to the reader to question something they'd read that s/he might not have otherwise, which, in turn, could lead him or her to post a possibly interesting question in the podcast forum
thread, and further discussion/learning, which, I assume, is the whole point
.
Using self as an example, the podcast reviews reissued through the daily-ish emails over the past several months
led me and my partner to buy and read Gaia's Garden and
Sepp Holzer's book on
permaculture much sooner than we would have otherwise. And, I think I might even post a nagging ? I have about Toby's assertion, "every bit of food, every scrap of lumber, each
medicinal herb or other human product that comes from someone's
yard means that one less chunk of
land outside one hometown needs to be denuded of natives and developed for human use." (Page 12, 2d ed.)
My only concern, and I don't know what one does about it, is the tendency we all have to feel as though listening to the reviews is somehow a substitute for reading the book. The reviews aren't a substitute of course, and aren't intended to be a substitute, and I guess listeners
should probably just keep that in mind.