Hi Gary,
I'm not sure how much research you've had time to do, but yesterday it rained and I had a day, away from chores and work, to do nothing but read (talk about living the dream).
Anyway, I've been using an older style rmh for over three years, maybe it's 4 now, i lose count sometimes. so my rmh is about ready for a tear down. cleaning, inspection, add insulation, that sort of thing. So I'm really glad I got into this discussion with you, because it led me to investigate the batch style rmh and after all sorts of reading misc stuff, some better than others, I found a thread leading to the development of the batch style RMH.
thread
This is a long one, and it is very informative about the thought processes and actual testing monitoring gasses and temps leading to the current SCIENCE around the batch heaters as they developed. This was especially interesting to me as I have long been unhappy with the frequency of adding wood and the extremely small kindling necessary, so just in the normal operation of the stove and watching the various elements and how they affect the draft etc., I was starting to think about ways to enlarge the firebox while not allowing smoke back into the room. This thread goes much farther with that process than I ever would've.
There is another
http://donkey32.proboards.com/thread/734/peterberg-batch-box-dimensions?page=1 and this one is the more advanced discussion once the batch heaters were optimized. In this one I got lots of technical terms answered, and exact measurements for everything so it gets pretty involved, even more so than the basic rocket mass heater.
I urge you to just take the time and read part or all of these threads before building the RMH. It is good to understand the principles and design parameters of the RMH as a start, but you may shortchange your design options and efficiency of your construction if you don't also have a beginning understanding of the possibilities of the batch heaters (which can also use the same "plumbing" through the mass if you so choose
If you are going to spend several days assembling materials and installing a unit it is well worth the time it takes to do some reading on this development as it potentially solves much of the inconvenience of the standard RMH, and also I think might help guide to better design choices even if you do end up with a more or less standard RMH.