Scott911 wrote:
A potential cross-over could be build in both the J and L into the same pipe.
Allow for the top of the "J" to be capped after inserting wood.
Once cap is in place, the air draw would be forced to come from end of "L"
I would presume this would offer best of both worlds- wood would gravity feed needing less attention, with little to no danger of fire creeping up sticks and smoking room.
Interesting idea! But feeding fuel into the J profile stoves appears to involve having a fair bit of the wood sticking out of the feed tube - at least until it burns down a way - so it would presumably require more of a U profile in order to provide a long
enough feed tube to be able to cap it?
I'm still thinking the L-profile works best for a cookstove. A few reasons -
[li]No horizontal space is lost accommodating the feed tube, and generally a more streamlined design which is easier to work with/around[/li]
[li]No smoke escape during start-up[/li]
[li]No particular benefit from having the self-feeding advantage of the J-profile since the stove will be fairly constantly attended while in use (it will be used in combination with a hay-box for longer cooking times and won't have an oven)[/li]
And conversely with a bathroom water heater, there doesn't seem to be a huge advantage in the L-profile. Though if smoke escape IS a regular feature with the J-profile, then maybe this is where your hybrid idea could be useful? Anybody with experience of a J-profile stove care to comment?
Thanks for the welcome! I quite often come to these forums to read up on stuff, but it's a measure of the quality of the discussions here that I haven't found the need to post a question before.