People should not see everything as a problem. If it's invasive chop and drop it. Ecologists have this tendency to see everything that is not super rare as a problem. Sure we must protect rare plants, keep some areas full of them in reserves. But why hate so much on plants that finally do well because they're well adapted or fix nitrogen or can live in cracks without being moddy codle to death, is beyond me. If they don't like it, chop it down and leave it to rot, build soil.
Prickly shrubs like sloe berry have been known as the oakmothers, wild life nor cattle came and ate oaks when they grew snugly were in a sloe grove. But in UK they go out by the hundreds with volunteers to kill the oakmothers every year. On the other hand they collect money for rewilding.
The black locust is such a problem to them where i live, but the farmers use them as fenceposts and they're one of the best firewoods out there.
The ecologists in Europe have decided it's the best to burn wood in incinerators for the environment. So we chop down USA forests and drag it over the ocean to make green energy.
Sure they do good things as well, but they're not critical of themselves. And i'm not saying, go out there and deliberately plant everything which is really invasive, one should always try to be conscious, but it's not a group of people that i consider to be right about things all the time.