• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Nancy Reading
  • Carla Burke
  • r ranson
  • John F Dean
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
stewards:
  • Jay Angler
  • Liv Smith
  • Leigh Tate
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
  • Timothy Norton
gardeners:
  • thomas rubino
  • Jeremy VanGelder
  • Maieshe Ljin

Sustainable Petroleum

 
Posts: 182
Location: Long Beach, CA
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If we eliminated using petroleum as fuel, could petroleum use for petro based products be non-harmful to the environment (provided we used a power source for processing that is also sustainable)? If not, why? How much less harmful would petro be?
 
pollinator
Posts: 11853
Location: Central Texas USA Latitude 30 Zone 8
1261
cat forest garden fish trees chicken fiber arts wood heat greening the desert
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Personally I think it could be significantly less damaging, possibly by orders of magnitude,  even though the process of getting it out of the ground is hazardous to the environment.  On the other hand, if we're not using it for transportation, there's likely enough hydrocarbons already out and about in the form of plastics and other materials which could be recycled for our needs, instead of wasted. So we wouldn't need to drill for oil anymore, or at least not for much of it.  In my opinion. 
 
Posts: 225
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (Mediterranean climate)
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Fuels make up 81% of use.

We could improve recycling by a lot in many areas to reduce the remaining 19% even further.

Asphalt takes 3%, doesn't seem like a lot, but considering there are tens of millions of barrels of oil produced every day, it is a lot.  Perhaps we can reduce our need for asphalt by cutting down hardscaping, and there might also be alternative ways to produce a product that does the same job.



 
Benjamin Burchall
Posts: 182
Location: Long Beach, CA
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What's the reference for that pie chart?
 
Hugh Hawk
Posts: 225
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (Mediterranean climate)
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sorry, I meant to put that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_products
 
                                
Posts: 98
Location: Eastern Colorado, USA
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Plastics.

Not, of course, your bottled water bottles.  Probably the majority of plastics made nowadays are wasted.  Not good.

But when they're made into PVC pipe, rain barrels, car bodies, window frames, computer monitors... perfectly useful things that can be recycled at the end of their useful life, I see this as worthwhile use of petroleum.

Burning it, not so much, when we have the technology to make more renewable fuels.
 
Posts: 488
Location: Foothills north of L.A., zone 9ish mediterranean
8
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
We need cradle to cradle design for all manufactured products that aren't compostable.  It really isn't that tough, and actually makes sense for the bottom line. 

Self-assembling 3d printers like the reprap are being designed with the idea of home-scale manufacture and recycling of products using a variety of materials - plastics, glass, metals.  Open source technology can solve these problems more efficiently than our centralized manufacturing system.

If we stopped using oil for fuel now, our existing wells would provide enough oil for non-fuel uses for a LONG time to come.  But this is an indulgent, theoretical question brought to you by the power of fossil fuels. 
 
Benjamin Burchall
Posts: 182
Location: Long Beach, CA
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

yukkuri_kame wrote:
But this is an indulgent, theoretical question brought to you by the power of fossil fuels. 



Hey! I'm in indulgent person! 
 
Another marshmallow on fire. No more for you tiny ad.
Heat your home with the twigs that naturally fall of the trees in your yard
http://woodheat.net
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic