posted 6 years ago
I agree with Su Ba.
All that is left for you now is to be the pest control yourself, Amit. You've essentially created a literal "sweet spot," where the concentration of food value there far outweighs anything around it. The scent trail on your operation is going to be huge, comparatively speaking, and it's worse when fruit drops, because any pest that scents ethylene from the rotting fruit will be on it in a flash.
There's lots of good advice here. I would suggest a hot compost of the affected windfalls if you can't get chickens in there. If you can get anything like a pond in there, some habitat for frogs and toads, that might greatly help, even if it's a quarter-barrel-sized sealed hole in the ground with mechanical aeration and some amphibian habitat species.
But after ensuring that fallen fruit was dealt with, I would focus on scent distraction, pollinator habitat, and measures to draw predatory insects. I would plant up any peripheral space, and any already unused trophic niches, in plants that are smelly, and perhaps that feed pollinators well.
I really wouldn't want to try and squeeze any more food plants in, at least no fruit, and nothing sweet and pungent, likely to draw pests. What plants do you grow that are eaten for their stems, shoots, leaves, or roots? Except perhaps for the tubers, those are less likely to be draws for the types of pests you're dealing with in the fruit and nuts.
Unfortunately, I think it's the "too much of a good thing" thing again. Yes, I love food forests. Yes, I'd like them everywhere. But to have a disproportionate amount of what you're growing being food, and fruit at that, is biologically akin to monoculture. A variety of plants are being grown, but their characteristics are so similar that they are easily preyed upon by one or two of the same pests.
That raises an interesting question, to me anyways: to what extent do we see that type of food species crowding in forests of any type? Do we see forests that are exclusively fruit and nut trees?
I don't think it's a symptom of that age of food forest. I think it's a system out of balance that Nature is trying to correct.
What is the potential outcome if She doesn't? I don't know for certain, but I imagine that pests that are attracted to overcrowded conditions might slow or stop the development of plant pathogens, or opportunistic fungi, by thinning things out and killing off that which there is too much of in any given space. Is it possible that this type of infestation exists to ensure we aren't breeding up stone fruit equivalents of Dutch Elm Disease or Chestnut Blight?
Is it possible that some aspects of what some of us aspire to do might actually not be so great for the greater ecology in the long run?
-CK
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
-Robert A. Heinlein