Rob Lineberger wrote:Maybe no one has snatched up the resource because it's not something people would think to do. If you'd asked me "what's a good soil amendment?" I don't think net scrapings would have ever made the list. Good for you thinking laterally.
It is hard to visualize this but I see four potential problems:
1) copper
IMO the way to check for that is ask for a crate or two of the sludge, then do a test area and plant plants. If a plant gets too much copper, it dies. I'd select an area you don't care about particularly much.
2) salt
IMO the way to check for that is ask for a crate or two of the sludge, then do a test area and plant plants. If a plant gets too much salt, it dies. :)
3) calcium
In aquaculture, shells are a way to alter the pH and calcium carbonate (hardness) levels of the water. It's kinda hard to alter the pH of soil, but dumping a ton of seashells on it seems like a good way. I'd do a thorough pH and hardness test on your test area, then again right after dumping the scrapings, then again a few weeks later.
4) impermeability
If you do indeed get a solid layer of algae-covered shells, I could see that leading to issues. You could get around this by screening the sludge, but screening 25 tons seems like a chore.
Now the benefits are cost, availability, and nutrients you wouldn't easily get otherwise. Is that worth the effort and risk? I don't know. It's a cool idea.
Thanks for the feedback!
I have the copper issue pegged is the number one problem; to address the others you raise:
2) Seaweed is a common soil amendment around here, widely used, and I have never seen anyone report issues that appear linked to salt.. even people mulching with it much more frequently than I would expect to use the net-scrapings. Still something to watch, though.
3) Calcium and upwards PH amendment is probably a good thing; soils in my area are generally acidic, and liming is a common practice. I haven't done a soil test yet, but going by weed indicators I am pretty confident my soil is acidic.
4) I am pretty confident that the physical barrier issue can be address through, well, physical means. IE, don't put on too much... and/or, break it up with a roller or tiller or tracked machine... I think that spreading it thinner is the optimal solution here, but trials will tell.. Screening many tons would indeed be a chore, a noisy, smelly, diesel-draining chore that I would prefer to avoid.. but I have no idea if it is possible to do so.
A test plot is definitely a reasonable idea; I am hoping to better understand the soil chemistry before I move forward though.
This has some interesting tidbits:
http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Management/pdfs/a2527.pdf
'Plants grown on newly reclaimed acid organic soils occasionally exhibit copper deficiency symptoms the first few years. After the organic matter begins to decompose when the soils are drained, sufficient copper is released to support normal crop growth'
So.. in a highly organic goop, maybe the copper is mostly bound to organic matter. Does this copper show up in the test?