Annie Collins wrote:
Cameron Miller wrote: I dont see why MORE pesticides would be used for animal consumption oats vs human. I believe its all the same stuff from the same field.
The attached link to an EPA page is an example of a product used in animal feed not allowed in food for humans, namely Propionic Acid. Page 2 and up is where it explains what it is and what it is used for.
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000464-00711-20100409.pdf
Wikipedia is stating that Propionic Acid is approved for use in even human food, including as a preservative in baked goods to inhibit mold growth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propionic_acid
I dont know much about this stuff, but it seems logical to me there would be no additional additives to oat livestock feed vs oat grain bought at the store, why would it? These chemicals are dangerous to wildlife it states as well, so why would greater quantities be used for livestock oat grain if it may hurt the animals? Just doesnt make sense why they would add an extra step for livestock grain.
My only belief so far is that livestock grain may have more derbies in it (
hay, stones, bugs, dung, etc) which I dont really think will be a huge impact. The livestock oats (which looks like quaker oats) is 1/2 the price so I am going to buy it and try it out. If it tastes funky I wont eat it. If it tastes the same (which I believe it will) I will continue to eat it.
I dont think anyone can really determine exactly how the oats are treated or processed.
Common sense tells me all steam rolled oat grains are processed the same. The only difference may be groccery oats such as quaker oats goes through a few additional air funnels to filter out loose derbies so it looks "perfect" for the consumer.