posted 3 years ago
Hmm, cool idea..
I have never built a geodesic dome, and I am not any sort of engineer..
I am thinking there is a potentially significant difference in loading between geodesic dome 'star' gussets, and some of the gussets in a standardish gable roof.
If you picture the most basic of gable trusses, it is a triangle. I think the top gusset doesnt generally see much load of any sort; the two struts are balancing and spreading the forces. The outer gussets, where the bottom chord of the truss connects to each side, are in tension; they are stopping the walls of the building from spreading.
As long as they do their job, no additional loads are introduced to the top gusset. If you skip the bottom chord of the truss, you've got rafters with no rafter tie, and we all know how that goes...
The potentially important difference is that the spreading load will increase dramatically as the angle of the triangle gets shallower.
The triangles in a geosdesic dome, not being very shallow by the nature of the shape, will help keep this loading modest. And, the need for a gusset that isn't flat makes the flexible material a neat fit, while this is not a benefit for a standard truss..
It also seems possible that force on a given gable truss may be notably higher than any one component of a dome..
If I decided to use tires in this way, I would do some redneck destructive testing. Calculate the expected load, and then make up some gussets and use them to lift a load around 2-3x the expected load, with a piece of heavy equipment.
The weight of steel items is fairly easy to calculate, if one doesnt have a suitable scale..
'Theoretically this level of creeping Orwellian dynamics should ramp up our awareness, but what happens instead is that each alert becomes less and less effective because we're incredibly stupid.' - Jerry Holkins