... power strips only! And at a height where it is useful again!
In our current household, which we wired to then standard NEC code 5 or so years ago, there's a one- or two-gang wall power outlet every so often, on each wall of each room of the house. One or more of these are on their own circuit. Note that these are very inconveniently placed ... a foot or so off the floor level.
The first thing we did, when we started living in this house, was add power strips ... one wall outlet has two plugs, so it now sports at least one power strip; in many cases, two power strips. Why? Because we need the outlets at "counter-, desk-, or any other height" that is more convenient than the wall outlet. Because we need more "plugs" for our device-hungry lifestyle. We hardly ever run all the devices at once, but they're all plugged in, all the time ...
So, *why have the wall outlet in the first place*? It's always "not where you need it", or "covered up by a piece of furniture". My back screams at me every time I have to work at the outlet level, because it's "way down there". The short
answer of why it is needed is because "this is code-required" or even worse, "that's the way it's always been". The long answer? It needs disruption ... it needs something different. Something better ...
Disruptive design achieved:
For our clean-sheet TinyHome on Skids (THoS), we have a blank slate. We won't be putting an outlet along a wall every X feet, at Y feet off the floor. The 1st floor is built, and electrical is roughing in. What we are doing is wiring a two-gang (4 outlets) box at floor level, in each corner of the TH. A (heavy-duty) power strip leads up to "counter-height" from one of the plugs.
Now we have a minimum of 6 plugs at a height that is much more convenient! A power switch is there, meaning we can kill all the ghost power drains with one push of a button! Surge protection, usb ports, varying plug designs that support wall warts and other plugs! The corner design supports power strips leading away on either adjacent wall; varying power strip cord lengths means any scenario is supported.
We find the perfect power strip *for us* (plug layout, other features), and we "build it in" to the cabinet, wall, or desk it is destined for. it is literally "built-in" to the location or furniture scenario. Now we have 6 plugs, a switch, and much more, wherever we need it! Built-in so it looks nifty! It's more functional! If we leave for an extended trip, all the power strips are turned off ... no more KWH's of ghost power drain!
Each 4-outlet box is now backed by a 20-amp circuit (12/2 romex in conduit), and each circuit is an AFCI/GFCI circuit breaker. No 15-amp circuits anywhere. Power strips are heavy-duty as well, with their own fuses, surge protection, etc.
Could we have gotten away with this, under the current code? Probably not, and mostly for hysterical reasons. But, we abandon the code anyway, where it presents these "barriers" to how we do things; in this case, the way we want to use the power. For clean-sheet stuff, like this THoS, we do away with the code altogether, and put in something we think is much better.
It's not "code-free", as it meets or beats code in many ways ... it's *better-than-code*, because now it *works the way we do*! No more silly outlets in the wrong place!
Hope this helps others ...