posted 12 years ago
I'm in a bit of a frenzy and running out of time to get my greenhouse RMH operating at maximum radiant heat output. It will be in the single digits for lows by the end of the week.
I posed this question in my other thread, but I think a new one more to the point would be more helpful to all.
My 6" Rocket heater in a 55gal barrel exhausts into a 6" 30ft effective length in ground duct with a 10ft vertical stack. I'm getting my top of barrel temps up to about 6-700deg, and the cob on the duct @1ft is ~145deg, @12ft ~115deg.
The first 12 ft of the duct is covered with ~800lbs of cob (~2in on top), the rest is covered with 3-4" of small gravel. I need to know which is my best absorption and radiant heat option to add more mass to the cob covered section.
1- Just add more cob (I only have about 200lbs left) to level off the top of the ducts' current cob covering, and maybe a thin layer of the fine limestone gravel spread over/into the fresh cob on top. I might be able to add more sand around the cob, but I am confused as to whether sand is good for absorbing and radiating heat as opposed to being an insulator.
2- Add the last of the cob to the top of the duct and set 2x8x16 cement / concrete cap blocks on the fresh cob. The cap blocks would be placed longways perpendicular to the duct for the 12ft run, and surrounded by the gravel floor.
I'd like to focus on this particular issue in this thread.
This likely won't solve my aquaponics greenhouse heat needs as I can now only gain a max of 30-35deg from outside temps, and most cold nights am unable to maintain more than 10deg above outside overnight. I plan on focusing on heating the water for the fish tanks which in turn will heat the gravel grow beds. The 2800lbs of gravel and 500gals of water will work as the much larger mass to radiate heat.
So on to the rocket heaters in greenhouses thread to address this plan.
"Necessity is the mother of invention" That's why I'm a Jack of all trades, Master of some and have learned that Knowledge is power, but information isn't necessarily knowledge.