posted 2 months ago
Hi there,
I should have said I am not interested in the exterior decoration, its beautiful, but a lot more time and money. I just like these cuz they are big, and in my uneducated opinion, size does matter in something like a masonry heater. I would think the more mass of masonry, the more heat, or at least longer heat it would give off.
OK, the kind of house, they are basically from the 1920s and 1930s, built before WWII, they are called doubles. Usually people own the house and rent out the other half to someone else. They have a full basement, where the furnace is located, and full attics that can be finished as another room. They are usually, typically between 2000 square feet and 3000 square feet. These kind of doubles often have a large full width front porch on the fist floor, and the same mirroring on the second floor. Sometimes people fully enclose the porch and insulate them for it to become another room to use year round.
Though I am not a stone mason, I do not believe a Russian Masonry Heater, let alone even a Rocket Mass Heater could built on the first floor in a house like these because of 1. the weight of these, and 2. the layout of the floorplan. There really is no where to put even a Rocket Mass Heater in these kind of older houses, and from an aesthetic design POV they would not blend in with these kind of older homes. These house have either baseboard heating, or older large radiators along walls and under windows, the place where one would typically put a Rocket Mass Heater, along an outside wall. This why I thought of having one built in the basement, there is already a concrete foundation that could support the weight on both of these. Large Russian Masonry Heaters in Russia even have beds on top of the heater itself, to show how big these are. Sometimes they can be over 6 feet tall, so these must weigh several tons