I found this a fascinating read. I'm reminded of Mulberries. They're sold in markets all over the world, where they can be harvested, transported to market, sold, and consumed all in one day. Mulberries do not work so well if you ask them to meet the needs of a grocery store because they cannot handle the shipment and storage and handling needs of a grocery store and remain economically viable.
In fact, to sell apples in a grocery store and remain economically viable, some of the money pays for refrigerated shipping, wax application, research, production, and application of preservatives, shipping loss, the companies and staff that manage every step between the tree and your grocery bag. When you finally buy and eat the
apple from the grocery store, a lot of the money you spent goes to support the grocery store model, and very little goes to support the cultivation and harvesting of the apple.
This really puts apples at a crippling disadvantage at a grocery store when competing against the goods that have an easier time meeting the needs of the grocery store model. Wheat and corn-based foods dominate our shelves because they are relatively easy to handle in bulk compared to mulberries. You can't ask people to buy a lot of mulberries if they do not know how to fit them into their household.
As a result, people wind up with a distorted view of what
should make up the foods of their plate as they walk down the aisles of a grocery store. I keep thinking about Paul's point in the original post about folks who just don't eat apples, not because they're unpleasant or unavailable or expensive, but because it doesn't fit their perception of their food. The vision of growing a
permaculture garden and making all the right decisions and sustainably feeding your community falls apart in my head unless there is a radical change in the way these people shop for food. And they will continue shopping this way for food as long as that is the easiest way to shop, by convenience, expense, and habit.