• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • Nancy Reading
  • John F Dean
  • r ranson
  • Jay Angler
  • paul wheaton
stewards:
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Liv Smith
  • Anne Miller
master gardeners:
  • Timothy Norton
  • Christopher Weeks
gardeners:
  • AndrĂ©s Bernal
  • Jeremy VanGelder
  • Matt McSpadden

can soil biology fix nutrient imbalance

 
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So, lets say I have plenty of all the various minerals in my soil, but the potassium and magnesium are out of whack. (Just to pick two at random.) Supposedly, this will mean that the plants are will be deficient, according to Steve Solomon, and so will I when I eat them. But, wouldn't the fungi and bacteria make sure the plant got the right amount of nutrients, regardless of chemical imbalances?

After reading Steve Solomon, I am wondering if I am killing myself by eating out of hugelkultures and sheet mulches full of potassium. If the biology mechanism does not work as I outlined above, then I had better find a way to get rid of lots of logs, mulch, and manure. (All high K, and very much looked down on by Steve Solomon.)
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

I just wanted to clarify something. I did not mean that fungi could magically make phosphorus or any other nutrient appear out of nowhere. I meant that if the phosphorus/ potassium or phosphorus/ calcium or the calcium/ iron balance were off, the fungi would feed their plants properly regardless. Steve Solomon's big point is balance, a fairly exact balance. And according to him our sheet mulches and hugelkultures are filling the land with potassium, thus throwing off the balance with phosphorus. But I think that the fungi this woody matter encourages makes this problem irrelevant. MOST land contains SOME of the various nutrients SOMEWHERE. If it does not, you will have to import it.

 
pollinator
Posts: 4154
Location: Northern New York Zone4-5 the OUTER 'RONDACs percip 36''
67
hugelkultur fungi books wofati solar woodworking
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Gilbert F. : For a partial answer look up 'Mother Tree' Good luck! For the Crafts ! big AL
 
out to pasture
Posts: 12372
Location: Portugal
3218
goat dog duck forest garden books wofati bee solar rocket stoves greening the desert
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

allen lumley wrote:Gilbert F. : For a partial answer look up 'Mother Tree' Good luck! For the Crafts ! big AL



Did someone call?

Ah, you want that link in my signature - look below, it's where all the interesting stuff happens...
 
steward
Posts: 7926
Location: Currently in Lake Stevens, WA. Home in Spokane
350
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
From my observations, Steve Solomon practices monoculture.
He plants blocks of single species, and these blocks are far enough apart that, that they cannot 'communicate' with each other.

Under such a monoculture, an imbalance can be catastrophic to the plants within it.
However, with a well diversified polyculture, the 'communication' between various species can help overcome this imbalance.

I believe that it is this communication that makes a savannah so much more productive than a plain pasture.
The 7 layers of a food forest help assure that each species is aiding, and receiving aid from its neighbors.
 
Posts: 155
Location: PNW, British Columbia
10
2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I guess the only way to know if you're creating an imbalance is to test your soil as Solomon recommends. Maybe wait til things have broken down a bit.

I personally go with both biology and chemistry, even though people on both sides tend to say you can focus on one and the other will follow.

Mycorrhizal fungi will help plants (except brassica, beets...) with phosphorus and secondarily zinc/manganese/copper. IF you apply soluble phosphorus, this relationship will not happen.

Buckwheat cover crops (other cover crops too) will free up minerals because they supposedly exude some acid around their roots.

But what if you have say a big deficiency in boron like I do? Should I trust the biology or should I add some borax?

What if I've been harvesting from my garden every year? Wouldn't levels of say, calcium, go down gradually? Can the biology provide as much as you're taking away?

 
Sam Boisseau
Posts: 155
Location: PNW, British Columbia
10
2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
By the way, this mother tree concept is quite interesting. I remember reading a study where a warm season grass ("c4") would "help" a cold-season grass ("c3") with the help of myccorhizal fungi. The key is that C4 grasses are better at photosynthesising and therefore better at feeding the fungi which in turn would help the other plant.

Now I plan to use corn (a warm season grass) as a mother plant throughout my garden (after inoculating it with myc. fungi)
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think if there is an actual deficiency of say, boron, all the fungi in the world will not help. But what I am focusing on are two cases, both of them real life.

1. All the correct minerals are in the soil in sufficient amounts, but the pH is off. There is anecdotal evidence that organic matter can allow high and low pH plants to grow side by side; probably because the accompanying fungi feed otherwise insoluble minerals to the plants.

2. Soils like my current one, which have all the right minerals, but little organic matter. Supposedly, if I add lots of high potassium logs and wood chips (or straw) I will tie up all the phosphorus, even though I have the same amount as before. But what I think it that the fungi from the rotten lots will "unbind" the preexisting phosphorus if this happens.

Of course, without the law of return, fungi or no fungi there will be problems.
 
Sam Boisseau
Posts: 155
Location: PNW, British Columbia
10
2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
1) pH and soil microbiology are linked too. Fungi might not be too happy at a high pH, so phosphorus might be an issue. At a low pH, aluminium and iron will be more available to plants, while other minerals might be less available. Low pH could also be a sign that you have some anaerobic conditions which isn't good for plant life.

Elaine Ingham tends to say that pH is determined by microbiology IIRC.

2) I think the phosphorus will free up progressively and that mycorrhizal fungi will help. That would be different fungi than the decomposers you have in your logs though.
Cover crops would help too.

Where did you read that potassium ties up phosphorus? I guess phosphorus tends to be tied up either way.

My personal plan for phosphorus (my soil test has low available phosphorus) is a combination of soft rock phosphate (aka colloidal phosphate aka Cal-phos) and mycorrhizal fungi.
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
That is one of Steve Solomon's big points, that most soils have so much potassium that plants can't get enough phosphorus.

Yes, I imagine that beyond a certain range of pH, soil biology will not help.

And that is one of my questions: I have a soil with plenty of phosphorus. Should I add soft rock phosphate to counterbalance the logs and chips?
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
See this thread for Steve Solomon's point of view.

https://permies.com/t/25483/hugelkultur/Potassium-Hugelkultur

According to him, hugelkultures would be a bad idea for this reason.

Here is a quote from him as well. I think he would also think that hugelkultures add too much organic matter. (He advocates using only a very small amount of compost.)

It was actually worse than he understood. Plants uptake as much potassium as there is available in the soil, and concentrate that potassium in their top growth. So when vegetation is hauled in and composted or when animal manure is imported, large quantities of potassium come along with them. As will be explained shortly, vegetation from forested regions like western Oregon is even more potassium-rich and contains less of other vital nutrients than vegetation from other areas. By covering his soil several inches thick with manure and compost every year he had totally saturated the earth with potassium. Its cation exchange capacity or in non-technical language, the soil's ability to hold other nutrients had been overwhelmed with potassium and all phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, and other nutrients had largely been washed away by rain. It was even worse than that! The nutritional quality of the vegetables grown on that superhumusy soil was very, very low and would have been far higher had he used tiny amounts of compost and, horror of all horrors, chemical fertilizer."



I conclude that organic matter is somewhat dangerous stuff whose use should be limited to the amount needed to maintain basic soil tilth and a healthy, complex soil ecology.

 
gardener
Posts: 4183
597
7
forest garden fungi trees food preservation bike medical herbs
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I agree with Sam and John Polk. Another way to look at it is to say that there's a long run and a short run. Plants with deep roots like trees, dandelion, horsetails, and most native prairie grasses can tap deep subsoil minerals, using mycorrhizal fungi as well to set their balance. Some minerals do tend to crowd each other out, but the microbiology can help balance that. Solomon basically doesn't plant anything other than annual vegetables, so he doesn't let nature take care of it in the long run with trees, bushes, fungi, etc. I like his soil analysis, but it's part of a larger picture. Get more organic material in your soil before you think about adding minerals, or you will flush them down into the water stream. If there's no organic material and soil food web, there won't be anything to catch the minerals once you place them, and if you set it up right, you shouldn't have to place them more than once. A lot of organic material will add the phosphorus. It did it for me.
John S
PDX OR
 
Sam Boisseau
Posts: 155
Location: PNW, British Columbia
10
2
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks for the link to the other thread.


First you'd have to be certain you have a potassium excess. It's possible you had a deficiency to start with and have added something you need. Also it's possible that you haven't been adding as much potassium as you imagine.


If your soil has a high cation exchange capacity (usually clays do but not always), whatever amount of potassium you added might not have made much a difference.

Random idea: I wonder if growing potatoes would help reduce potassium levels.


I'm not sure where Solomon said that high potassium ties up the phosphorus. Or why phosphorus would get washed out by rain. Is it that potassium displaces cations such as calcium and magnesium and then those cations combine with phosphorus and get washed away? So you would be losing your available phosphorus and only be left with tied up phosphorus. Did I get this right?


I read a book by Gary Zimmer called "Advancing Biological Farming". A couple things form that book:

- the best way to get plant available phosphorus is to promote soil life and planting a diversity of crops including cover crops
- high potassium will interfere with the intake of calcium and magnesium
- if potassium levels are too high, apply calcium to help kick off that potassium off the clay/humus complex where it is held



In the end I wouldn't worry too much, I'm going to guess that Solomon's words are directed at a practice where people are adding compost year after year without paying attention to possible excesses they might be creating. I'd say do a soil test when you or your garden is ready and see how it fits within Solomon's guidelines.
 
Burra Maluca
out to pasture
Posts: 12372
Location: Portugal
3218
goat dog duck forest garden books wofati bee solar rocket stoves greening the desert
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I found this playlist of two days of lectures by Elaine Ingham on youtube, if you have the time to watch them all.


 
author and steward
Posts: 51171
Location: missoula, montana (zone 4)
hugelkultur trees chicken wofati bee woodworking
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
(I am away from my computer right now this is a quick note from my cell phone)

I think the answer you seek is in cation exchange capacity. Check out the podcast I did with Helen at those on soil science. It was also a review of the dvd "agronomy in a day"

 
Burra Maluca
out to pasture
Posts: 12372
Location: Portugal
3218
goat dog duck forest garden books wofati bee solar rocket stoves greening the desert
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Here's the thread for the podcast, but the link to the actual podcast doesn't seem to be working at the moment.

https://permies.com/t/19840/permaculture-podcast/Podcast-Review-Hands-Agronomy
 
Posts: 632
31
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have Mr. Solomon's book. He has some insights.

I don't think he has the whole picture though.


Are there certain circumstances, where a mineral imbalance can make plants that survive, but don't thrive. Yes. But I think they are rare in the presence of a robust highly diverse soil biology.

Or, plants that look good, but don't produce optimally nutrient dense food. Yes.n But I think they are rare in the presence of a robust highly diverse soil biology.


There are several schools of though that are very keen on balancing to get good outcomes.

At the bad end of that spectrum, there are folks who suggest that soil is just what holds the plant up. We don't need any soil biology and it just introduces risk. We'll throw in the 3 macronutrients, and 11 micronutrients and produce wonderful food from straight sand.

It might even work, but I fundamentally disagree with the premise.



I am very keen on improving soil microbial diversity through the use of more organic matter. So far, I have turned lousy neglected soil that struggled to grow runty sweet corn, and really, runty everything, into

what looks like and acts like the best soil in the county. My 2.5 secrets are compost, wood mulch, and some ag sulfur for some very alkaline spots.


Who "balances" the forest? The soil micro-herd, primarily the fugi.
 
Troy Rhodes
Posts: 632
31
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
By the way, if you really really like to do soil analysis and play by the numbers, adding biochar will significantly if not dramatically improve your cation exchange numbers.

Cation exchange is a good measure of the storage capacity of your soil for nutrients. Very sandy soil has lousy cation exchange numbers for example. Rain just washes out the nutrients.

The unbelievably high surface area of biochar directly adsorbs a significant amount of nutrients, and (I believe) more significantly, provides an ideal substrate for the 100s and 1000s

of species of soil life to set up shop together to trade nutrients.



troy
 
paul wheaton
author and steward
Posts: 51171
Location: missoula, montana (zone 4)
hugelkultur trees chicken wofati bee woodworking
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Troy Rhodes wrote:By the way, if you really really like to do soil analysis and play by the numbers, adding biochar will significantly if not dramatically improve your cation exchange numbers.



Adding clay to the soil will also add CEC, but, unlike biochar, doesn't take a lot of work and putting greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.

Adding organic matter to the soil will also add CEC, but, unlike biochar, doesn't take a lot of work and putting greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.

In fact, if you live in a cooler climate and are thinking of adding biochar, and have wood for the biochar process, you can just stick that wood into the ground instead of going through all the work and pollution of creating biochar. Chances are that skipping the biochar process will have greater benefit for the soil. If the brown cubicle rot fungus finds that wood, the wood will last 500 years in the soil.

Biochar is excellent for soil, when done properly. And is a damn smart thing to do ..... in tropical climates.
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Paul!

And thanks everybody for all the other great answers, too.

It is wonderful to have a community like this to come to for answers.
 
Gilbert Fritz
pollinator
Posts: 1759
Location: Denver, CO
122
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
A permaculture practitioner did an experiment to see if Solomon is right about the imbalanced effect of high potassium mulch. Here is the link: http://www.waldeneffect.org/blog/Do_wood_and_straw_raise_soil_potassium_levels__63__/

Nothing like actual experiments!
 
steward
Posts: 4673
Location: Queensland, Australia
1029
6
dog trees books bike fiber arts medical herbs bee seed solar homestead composting
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This fascinating new YouTube excerpt from Ernie and Erica Wisner might be of interest here. Part of the online permaculture design course, the clip is all about energy and nutrient exchange in the natural world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6y4lJmcE-8

You can also see the full class here: https://permies.com/wiki/190538/Tree-ecology-energy-exchange
 
John Suavecito
gardener
Posts: 4183
597
7
forest garden fungi trees food preservation bike medical herbs
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I am going to do something that might be unwise. I am going to disagree with Paul Wheaton on his site.  One major point of biochar is that wood has a natural cycle.  It grows, falls, and rots.  Then the carbon goes back up into the atmosphere. Eventually, another baby tree will start growing. That's the cycle.   When you make biochar, you aren't putting most of that carbon into the atmosphere.  The tannins, oils, and some smoke goes into the atmosphere.  The carbon stays in the soil way beyond the wood cycle.  The biochar in Terra Preta is still there 500 years later, so far, after all of the people who made it are gone. There are also innumerable microbes, holding onto water and nutrients.   There is no reason to think that biochar will somehow "rot" faster in a colder climate.   Wood rots way faster in a hot climate.  If you live in a part of the world like I do, where there is too much wood, and people are giving it away, it's easy to get  enough wood for biochar.  Too much wood in the soil can mess up the carbon-nitrogen ratios in the soil and make it hard to grow much.  Also, trees and bushes fall over when you plant them on top of a hugulkultur.  Hugulkultur itself is a lot of work!  Biochar makes hotels for microbes in the soil.  As Elaine Ingham says, if you get the microbes right, they will take care of the nutrients.  It's getting much drier and hotter here in the summer.  Biochar absorbs 6 times its volume in water, which is crucial, this time of year.  Biochar is probably better where I live, the PNWet, than in Montana, or other dry places like where Paul lives and the soil tends toward alkaline soils.  Wood rots, and then you'd have to do it all over again. Biochar lasts for 500 years, so far, but probably a lot longer.  

John S
PDX OR
 
Hold that thought. Tiny ad:
Back the BEL - Invest in the Permaculture Bootcamp
https://permies.com/w/bel-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic