I am new to this forum, and I have been experimenting with rocket stoves and rocket mass
heaters for about three years before visiting this site. I had run across Paul's videos and finally decided to come and visit his site, and I am glad I did and hope to be a regular contributor in many areas here as I develop this
land (100 acres of south facing steep wooded slope with about 5 acres reasonably usable for on contour swales and hugleculture applications - all in very neglected shape as of right now) into a
permaculture paradise. I hope to continue to learn from the rest of you fine folks, as well as sharing my insights and hard learned lessons along the way.
Now to my question. I first got into my head that vermiculite was the best aggregate for light weight
concrete as well as a great insulator, and now that I visit this forum all I ever see talked about is perlite. Is there a difference in performance? Being an old school concrete superintendent and having built everything from bridges to refineries, to K Marts, I am stuck in the vermiculite frame of mind when thinking of concrete casting. I have recently built a
rocket mass heater in my work shop, and I am quite impressed and satisfied with the performance, but I will soon be building one in the main house, and I want to do the best job I can do, so is perlite better? I have a 8" system in my shop with a kiln brick fire box and combustion chamber feeding a terracotta flue chimney with a 2" cast layer of vermiculite mixed 5 parts vermiculite/1 part refractory clay, and 1 part Portland cement. The burn box and combustion combustion chamber are finished out with 2"x 8*'x 16" masonry pavers set on edge and 2" of vermiculite between the fire box/ combustion chamber and the outside paver "skin." Over the burn chamber there is 3" of vermiculite covered with a 2" concrete slab, locking the tops of the outside paver "skin" together for a solid mass. The mass is formed with 8" ducting and an outer "skin" of the on edge pavers, filled with a sand/ clay mix, and topped with 2" of concrete. I have been running it for about 2 weeks now and I am quite happy with the performance, but I want to know if I can do better on the main house's
RMH.
Also I would like input as to whether the terracotta flue is a mistake. I was buying my kiln brick, refractory clay, and vermiculite when I saw the flue sections, and the salesman said he thought they would work for my application. Like I said, I cast in place a 2" insulation on the outside of it, so I am hoping that this is not a mistake and wondering if I
should repeat it in the main house
RMH. Any comments would be appreciated because this was an impulse purchase and design change and I have never heard of anyone doing this in all of my research. The 24" sections were only $16 each and it took 1 3/4 for the height I needed for the drum I used. Like I said, I am very happy with the performance of the system, but it is only about 2 weeks old and I am now wondering if the terracotta flue will break down in time. I had a portable
rocket stove made out of stainless steel, and it only took 2 winters and it was rotten and all but evaporated. I would hope that the terracotta flue pipe would hold up much linger.