someone told me the way they disposed of their garbage was to dig trenches and burn it. covering with soil before a complete burn. unaware of biochar itself.
and over hundreds of years with of grains and other plants and not tilling, they could build a lot of soil? ??
Bryant RedHawk wrote:hau John, yes biochar needs to be charged with bacteria prior to use. In the fields where biochar has been discovered it is a layer about 2' thick and found about a foot down, this is most likely from the actions of spreading then tilling it in.
I don't think anyone really knows how the layer get to be a foot under the top soil in those cases of discovery.
I have a garden space that has been biochar treated, it has not performed any better or worse than the other garden spaces we have.
I have gotten better improvement by broadcasting Sea-90 than I have with biochar.
But my area is not really anything like the areas where they discovered biochar in the soil, and that may be part of the way it acts on my land.
I believe biochar works but my observations are leaning toward it being better for certain soil types than others.
My land is 1.5 feet of good forest top soil with a 2 foot layer of red clay then you hit bed rock.
The areas I treated with biochar have not shown any difference in productivity, water holding, bio activity than the other, non-treated spaces.
I'm only two years in on the experiment so things may change over time, the discovery of biochar indicated it had been in place for a long time so it may be that it needs to be in situ for quite a while before you really get full benefits from it.