posted 7 years ago
Here where we are not as subsidized as Denmark it is not so easy.
Unfortunately the grants for energy are different. Last year I really got robbed by a government grant entity. I was at a farm show and they assured me that we qualified for energy grants, so we applied and went to a meeting. There they took my plans for a unique waterer that kept livestock stock tanks at an ideal temperature by geothermal heat. The woman (an attorney) took photos of my blueprints, gushed about how it would help so many people that had the same problem here in frigid New England, then a week later said that I was qualified for the grant, but that they would not champion it because they were understaffed.
The sad thing is, the bigger farms and wealthy people are the ones who qualify or get the grants, many for only 50% coverage of the project. The silver lining is that it reduces global emissions because fewer people are using fossil fueled appliances, but it shifts the financial burden to the poor. That is because they cannot join the party. The more well to do save money on their utility costs by using wind, geothermal, solar etc, but they could have afforded those products in the beginning, or afforded their utility costs. In contrast, the poor cannot. Because of the way we pay for electrical costs on a per unit consumed basis, our utility costs are still high. It still costs companies a lot to maintain power lines, get new vehicles, pay wages, etc; all of which are going up, not down. That means the governmental boards controlling the rates on these monopolies go up per unit basis, so the poor pay even higher electric rates.
This motivates the wealthy to invest in more energy efficient systems since the return on investment is now less, and thus the cycle continues. We are actually in a death spiral on this. The only way to get off is to go off-grid, but few poor people can afford that either. Land, systems, even custody plays into that. For instance my ex-wife would have my daughter taken from me if we lived in a way that was "unconventional". That would mean what I would save in electricity costs I would pay back in child support payments! So her house (she is well off) gets solar, geothermal, and wind power while I struggle to farm and pay my electrical bill!
But it gets worse for the poor.
Since a lot of these upgrades to the well to do who can afford the 50% match on grants, in the form of higher taxes we help fund our own utility struggle. In other words the poor get hit twice; with higher utility costs, and then higher taxes.