• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Aprovecho Justa Stove  RSS feed

 
Posts: 35
7
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In the "rocket heater book" as well as here on the forums and elsewhere on the internet it is stressed heavily that the cross sectional area of the burn tunnel be the tightest place anywhere in the system otherwise you cause a bottleneck and inefficient burn/lack of draft etc.

I am wondering if anyone is familiar with the Aprovecho "Justa Stove" design. They utilize a 5" diameter rocket (which also has a height well below what is recommended in the previously mentioned places) 5" round burn tunnel is roughly a 20" cross section. They then force the flue gasses/flame path through a 1" gap under a 12" wide cook surface or in other words... a 12" cross sectional area. So why do they not create a huge bottleneck when doing this? what am I missing?? This seems to be a proven design with much research done.

Justa Stove Plan

By the way I ask because I am working on tweaking the performance of the 3rd generation of my rocket powered maple syrup evaporator which is quite similar in design...

 
pollinator
Posts: 268
Location: SoCal USA
30
bike cat dog tiny house trees
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
A rocket stove has far less back pressure to overcome, compared to a rocket mass heater (RMH). The RMH has many feet of ducting running through the mass, causing resistance to air flow. I would expect that a simpler rocket stove can overcome this one restriction because there's so little beyond that to also overcome.
 
Enjoy the full beauty of the english language. Embedded in this tiny ad:
Binge on 17 Seasons of Permaculture Design Monkeys!
http://permaculture-design-course.com
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!