• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • John F Dean
  • r ransom
  • Nancy Reading
  • Timothy Norton
  • Jay Angler
stewards:
  • paul wheaton
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Eric Hanson
master gardeners:
  • Christopher Weeks
  • M Ljin
gardeners:
  • thomas rubino
  • Megan Palmer
  • Benjamin Dinkel

Conductivity/efficiency of red clay brick

 
Posts: 8
Location: Birmingham al
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I’m looking into Matt walkers j-tube design, of which the mass is primarily brick.

My question is how well/ does brick perform in contrast to cob, in terms Effie irntly storeing the heat or any other criteria for that matter.
 
gardener
Posts: 602
Location: Boudamasa, Chad
228
2
forest garden
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey Wes,

Cob, as well as any uncooked earth, is not as good of a thermal mass as fired brick. Un-fired earth breathes more--which has its own applications... Additionally, an industrial-made brick is VERY dense, and that also means better thermal mass.
 
gardener
Posts: 3471
Location: Southern alps, on the French side of the french /italian border 5000ft elevation
194
 
Nathanael Szobody
gardener
Posts: 602
Location: Boudamasa, Chad
228
2
forest garden
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Satamax Antone wrote:https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sensible-heat-storage-d_1217.html



Those are some pretty cool charts. Too bad the sensible heat storage chart doesn't include anything of natural earth...
 
Satamax Antone
gardener
Posts: 3471
Location: Southern alps, on the French side of the french /italian border 5000ft elevation
194
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Nathanael Szobody wrote:

Satamax Antone wrote:https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sensible-heat-storage-d_1217.html



Those are some pretty cool charts. Too bad the sensible heat storage chart doesn't include anything of natural earth...



Well, i just did a quick search to lead you guys there. I'm pretty sure there is an extended chart. Somewhere. You will have to dig it yourselves.
 
Wes Turner
Posts: 8
Location: Birmingham al
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
That was a revealing chart.

It would seem that brick is the way to go, rather than Cob, except for cost.

If one merely stacked the bricks with out mortar would it substantially diminish the thermal storage of the mass?
 
Satamax Antone
gardener
Posts: 3471
Location: Southern alps, on the French side of the french /italian border 5000ft elevation
194
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Wes, the air gap that it makes between bricks, slows the travel of the heat through the joints. Better to glue your bricks up with mud. Just sieve some dirt, and use that.
 
Wes Turner
Posts: 8
Location: Birmingham al
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
When you say save some mud, do you mean to use cob material in lieu of mortar?, is mud/cob mortar easier to break apart than traditional mortar?
 
Satamax Antone
gardener
Posts: 3471
Location: Southern alps, on the French side of the french /italian border 5000ft elevation
194
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sieve some mud, yep. Not even clay.  Just mud without rocks. If you need to reuse your bricks, just scrape znd wet them.  
 
master rocket scientist
Posts: 6949
Location: latitude 47 N.W. montana zone 6A
3949
cat pig rocket stoves
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Wes;

Yes, mortar is harder than the clay brick it is on . Very common for the brick to break before you can remove the mortar. As Max said,  Cob/ mud will pop right apart and scrape clean in seconds.
 
A "dutch baby" is not a baby. But this tiny ad is baby sized:
Learn Permaculture through a little hard work
https://wheaton-labs.com/bootcamp
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic