I've seen Brix meters on Amazon, but didn't know if I could trust them.
I was originally planning to use it in my testing of various melons for my
landrace projects, but until then, I'll just have to keep eating them and deciding if I like the flavors/textures enough to save seeds for the mix. I don't have extensive
experience with winter squash, but I'm learning quickly and cooking/tasting about every one I come across. I think this is a really good idea though for one aspect of information that goes into deciding to save seed from an individual squash or not.
For example, say you are developing a
landrace of moschata squash, and you just harvested all shapes and sizes. It's easy to see a color difference in flesh, but with the data from brix testing, you could choose the sweetest squash out of the lot for seed saving if you are wanting a sweet squash. I would say you
should still sort for flesh color, texture when cooked, etc. However, if after so many generations, all of the visual qualities are equal, and you still wanted to refine your squash into a sweeter direction, the minute differences between one another on the brix scale could be ascertained.
I saw a YouTube video once with someone that tested their melons with a brix meter, and chronicled the process of the entire crop of 20 or 30 melons. They were all grown in an indoor
greenhouse type situation, same melons, same age, same fertilizing inputs, same everything...except brix. Some were lower, some were average among the lot, and a small number exceeded the average by a few points. In the pursuit of sweeter producing genetics, those seeds could be saved, grown, and tested again. Over multiple generations, you could gradually slide the scale upwards in natural sugar averages. Sounds like a reasonable input for decision making to me.