Noon Baldwin wrote:Hi, am curious on people's thoughts on rammed earth underground away from earth and not as load bearing. So without filling the space between earth and rammed earth( which would just be walls as stone column s would be load bearing of roof. As it's on a hillside,one side earth, two sides sloping down hill and one facade all windows.
Ventilation windows on top of rammed earth on earth side . Two sloped roof one vegetal and the other polycarbonate for light.. just checking out the whole idea as I'd like to not build great big concrete walls.. thanks for your advice
If you're sure it will stay dry, and that the load is vertical from above, in my opinion, rammed earth is great. If there's any lateral load (pushing from the side, or filled on one side with the surrounding earth), then rammed earth is unlikely to hold for the long term. And in the event of a flood, unstabilized rammed earth risks turning to mud. Have you thought about all possible weather events and decided that flood is not possible?
Rammed earth is wonderful in the appropriate place, both for exterior and interior walls. I've lived with unstabilized rammed earth buildings for a few decades (unstabilized means no cement or lime, just earth). I love its thermal mass property, its feeling of warmth in the room, its hygroscopic properties (it absorbs and releases humidity), and its acoustic properties (absorbing sound, but not too much, and not being echoey and harsh).